Job satisfaction and improvement factors in primary care professionals

被引:13
作者
Perez-Ciordia, I. [1 ,2 ]
Guillen-Grima, F. [2 ,3 ]
Brugos, A. [1 ,2 ]
Aguinaga Ontoso, I. [2 ]
机构
[1] Serv Navarro Salud Osasunbidea, Pamplona, Spain
[2] Univ Publ Navarra, Dept Ciencias Salud, Pamplona, Spain
[3] Univ Navarra Clin, Unidad Med Prevent, Pamplona, Spain
关键词
Job satisfaction; Primary care; Healthcare quality; PHYSICIAN SATISFACTION; HEALTH; QUALITY;
D O I
10.4321/S1137-66272013000200008
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. The quality of services in a health system is related to the level of satisfaction of its professionals. The aim of this article is to determine job satisfaction in primary care professionals and rank those factors capable of improving it. Methodology. Descriptive study carried out in Navarre in 2010. A validated questionnaire was sent by post to the population of the study: primary care doctors, pediatricians and nurses. Variables on socio-demographic data were collected and job satisfaction was self-evaluated on a scale of 1 to 10. Respondents were asked to rank 10 factors that could improve the previously mentioned satisfaction. Averages were compared and bivariate analysis was carried out using the chi-square test, studying the association between variables through the Odds Ratio (OR), The adjusted analysis was realized through unconditional logistic regression. Results. We collected 432 questionnaires (77.5%). Average satisfaction was 6.7 (scale of 1 to 10), higher in nursing. Women showed a higher average than men (6.90:6.34). The workers at urban health centers (OR: 1.71; CI: 1.10-2.65) showed a higher risk of dissatisfaction with respect to professionals at rural centers. The training activities of the professional is the most highly valued item, followed by economic questions and questions of care pressure, with no differences found by profession. Conclusion. Job satisfaction is a dimension of quality management in primary care and its study enables identification of problems or opportunities for improvement with an impact on the quality of the services offered.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 262
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
ARRIAGA E, 2003, ENFERMERIA GLOBAL, V3
[2]  
Canovas A, 2001, REV CALID ASIST, V16, P243, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1134-282X(01)77415-5
[3]   Effects of policy options for human resources for health: an analysis of systematic reviews [J].
Chopra, Mickey ;
Munro, Salla ;
Lavis, John N. ;
Vist, Gunn ;
Bennett, Sara .
LANCET, 2008, 371 (9613) :668-674
[4]  
de Mercado Lazaro, 1998, MOTIVACION SALUDABLE, P283
[5]  
Devoe J, 2002, J FAM PRACTICE, V51, P223
[6]   The relationship between job satisfaction and health: a meta-analysis [J].
Faragher, EB ;
Cass, M ;
Cooper, CL .
OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2005, 62 (02) :105-112
[7]  
FERNANDEZ I, 1995, REV ESP SALUD PUBLIC, V69, P487
[8]   Burn out syndrome [J].
Ferrer, R .
MEDICINA CLINICA, 2002, 119 (13) :495-496
[9]   Health sector reform and public sector health worker motivation: a conceptual framework [J].
Franco, LM ;
Bennett, S ;
Kanfer, R .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2002, 54 (08) :1255-1266
[10]   Satisfaction and well-being of primary care providers in managed care [J].
Freeborn, DK ;
Hooker, RS ;
Pope, CR .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2002, 25 (02) :239-254