Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion

被引:60
作者
Allen, Rebecca H. [1 ]
Bartz, Deborah [2 ]
Grimes, David A. [3 ]
Hubacher, David [3 ]
O'Brien, Paul [4 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Women & Infants Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Providence, RI 02905 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Biol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Family Hlth Int, Behav & Biomed Res, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[4] Cent W London Community Serv, Westside Contracept Serv, Raymede Clin, London, England
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2009年 / 03期
关键词
LOCAL-ANESTHESIA; IUD INSERTION; CONTRACEPTION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD007373.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Fear of pain during intrauterine device (IUD) insertion is a barrier to use of this contraceptive method. Interventions for pain during IUD insertion include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), local cervical anesthetics, and cervical ripening agents such as misoprostol. Objectives To review all randomized controlled trials that have evaluated a treatment for IUD insertion-related pain. Search strategy We searched the computerized databases MEDLINE, POPLINE, CENTRAL, and EMBASE for relevant trials. We also examined reference lists of pertinent articles and wrote to known investigators for information about other published or unpublished trials. Selection criteria We included all randomized controlled trials in any language that evaluated a treatment for IUD insertion-related pain. The intervention could be compared to a placebo or another active intervention. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently abstracted data from relevant trials and data were entered into Rev Man 5.0 for analysis. For dichotomous variables, the Peto odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals was calculated. For continuous variables, the mean differences with 95% confidence interval was computed. Main results Four trials met the inclusion criteria; the total number of participants was 2204. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs of varying types and doses were not effective for reducing pain during IUD insertion. Misoprostol for cervical ripening did not reduce pain with IUD insertion in nulliparous women. Two trials evaluated pain that occurs after IUD insertion using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In one trial, naproxen taken prior to IUD insertion was effective in reducing pain compared with placebo in the first two hours after IUD insertion in mostly nulliparous women. However, this trial utilized the Dalkon Shield, an IUD with a wider diameter than modern IUDs. In another trial, ibuprofen 600 mg taken before IUD insertion did not show evidence of an effect on pain four to six hours after IUD insertion. Authors' conclusions No interventions that have been properly evaluated reduce pain during or after IUD insertion. One poorly controlled trial suggested that topical lidocaine gel may reduce insertion-related pain and warrants further investigation.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] BEDNAREK P, 2008, PROPHYLACTIC IBUPROF
  • [2] Worldwide use of intrauterine devices for contraception
    d'Arcangues, Catherine
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2007, 75 (06) : S2 - S7
  • [3] EDELMAN A, 2008, EFFECT PROPHYLACTIC
  • [4] Goldberg Alisa B, 2003, Curr Womens Health Rep, V3, P475
  • [5] GOLDSTUCK N D, 1985, Clinical Reproduction and Fertility, V3, P65
  • [6] GOLDSTUCK N D, 1987, Advances in Contraception, V3, P25, DOI 10.1007/BF01849250
  • [7] GOLDSTUCK ND, 1983, CONTRACEPT DELIV SYS, V4, P33
  • [8] Grimes D. A., 2006, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V4
  • [9] Intrauterine contraception as an alternative to interval tubal sterilization - Commentary
    Grimes, David A.
    Mishell, Daniel R., Jr.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2008, 77 (01) : 6 - 9
  • [10] HELMERHORST FM, 2008, VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL