Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Plastic Surgery An Introduction and Review of Clinical Applications

被引:41
作者
Sharma, Kavita [1 ]
Steele, Kathryn [2 ]
Birks, Meg [3 ]
Jones, Georgina [4 ]
Miller, Gavin [5 ]
机构
[1] Glasgow Royal Infirm, Canniesburn Plast Unit, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] NHS Trust, Nottingham Univ Hosp, Nottingham, England
[3] Sheffield Teaching Hosp, Sheffield Hand Ctr, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[4] Leeds Beckett Univ, Leeds Sch Social Sci, Dept Psychol, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Clairemont Private Hosp, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
patient-reported outcome measures; PROMs; review; BREAST SURGERY; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000001894
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Clinical care is often directed at improving patient's quality of life, the effectiveness of which can be measured by objective or subjective outcomes. Surgical intervention, especially in plastic and reconstructive surgery, can often provide hard objective measures, for example, breast size reduction after bilateral reduction mammaplasty, or improved joint position/movement after Dupuytren's surgery. These measurements do not describe how a particular intervention affects the patient's life, from their point of view. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are validated questionnaires completed by patients about their health, functioning, health behaviors and quality of care. Patient-reported outcome measures reflect the patient's perspective and their use increases the meaningfulness of outcomes measured, for whatever purpose. There is therefore a growing interest in PROMs as part of routine clinical practice in the United Kingdom and worldwide. This article aims to provide an introduction of PROMs to plastic surgeons, a description of how PROMs are developed and scored, along with the most commonly used tools currently most applicable to plastic surgery. The benefits of PROMs on a local, regional, and national level are discussed, and we aim to set out how these tools can be used in auditing individual and departmental performance against national standards. We will also provide suggestions for sustainable use of PROMs in the clinical environment, advice on choosing the right outcome measure, and our views on electronic data collection, analysis, and interpretation of the results. Patient-reported outcome measures are highly relevant clinical practice and will undoubtedly with time become routine. We encourage plastic surgeons to explore the possibilities these tools can provide in helping improve the quality of care we deliver to our patients.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 252
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Alsarraf Ramsey, 2002, Facial Plast Surg, V18, P77, DOI 10.1055/s-2002-32197
[2]   Outcome assessment for carpal tunnel surgery: The relative responsiveness of generic, arthritis-specific, disease-specific, and physical examination measures [J].
Amadio, PC ;
Silverstein, MD ;
Ilstrup, DM ;
Schleck, CD ;
Jensen, LM .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1996, 21A (03) :338-346
[3]   Validation of the Breast Evaluation Questionnaire for use with breast surgery patients [J].
Anderson, Rebecca Cogwell ;
Cunningham, Bruce ;
Tafesse, Eskinder ;
Lenderking, William R. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 118 (03) :597-602
[4]  
[Anonymous], OUR NHS OUR FUTURE N
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Guidance for industry: Patient-Reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, EQ EXC LIB NHS
[7]   Development of the QuickDASH: Comparison of three item-reduction approaches [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Wright, JG ;
Katz, JN .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (05) :1038-1046
[8]  
Black N, 2013, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V346, pf167, DOI [DOI 10.1136/BMJ.F167, 10.1136/bmj.f167]
[9]  
Boyle S, 2011, HEALT SYST TRANSIT, V13, P1
[10]   REPORTING OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES [J].
BRACKEN, MB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1989, 96 (04) :383-388