Statistical evaluation of data from tractor guidance systems

被引:10
|
作者
Dunn, Peter K. [1 ]
Powierski, Andrew P.
Hill, Rodger
机构
[1] Univ So Queensland, Australian Ctr Sustainable Catchments, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
[2] Univ So Queensland, Fac Sci, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
[3] Australian Inst Hlth & Welf, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[4] Goulburn Murray Water, Kerang, Vic 3579, Australia
关键词
accuracy; precision; guidance system; autocorrelation;
D O I
10.1007/s11119-006-9007-8
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Statistical tools are discussed for the analysis of data collected from tractor guidance systems. The importance of both accuracy and precision is discussed, and statistical tools for analysis are considered which incorporate important features of the data. In particular, accuracy is modelled using a generalized least squares model incorporating autocorrelation, and variances (inverse of precision) using a gamma generalized linear model. The methods are applied to data collected during an experiment conducted with a Trimble receiver used with a Beeline tractor guidance system. Three different scenarios are considered, then compared: a tractor simulating ploughing a field; the tractor pulling a plough with the receivers on the tractor; the tractor pulling a plough with the Trimble receiver on the plough. The change in the precision and accuracy between the scenarios is discussed. Data were recorded over repeated swaths for each scenario. After discussing specific statistical techniques for analysis of this type of data, the collected data are analysed; major conclusions are: The data from the Trimble receiver showed evidence of autocorrelation in the offsets; the plough recorded a variance about three times that recorded by the tractor.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 192
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of a bronchoscopy guidance system for bronchoscopy training, a randomized controlled trial
    Follmann, Andreas
    Pereira, Carina Barbosa
    Knauel, Julia
    Rossaint, Rolf
    Czaplik, Michael
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [42] Design of autonomous smartphone based quadrotor and implementation of navigation and guidance systems
    Hayajneh, Mohammad
    Melega, Marco
    Marconi, Lorenzo
    MECHATRONICS, 2018, 49 : 119 - 133
  • [43] Could It Be Better to Discard 90% of the Data? A Statistical Paradox
    Stanley, T. D.
    Jarrell, Stephen B.
    Doucouliagos, Hristos
    AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2010, 64 (01) : 70 - 77
  • [44] Statistical methodological review for time-series data
    Rahardja, Dewi
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICS & MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, 2020, 23 (08) : 1445 - 1461
  • [45] Statistical process monitoring of time-dependent data
    De Ketelaere, Bart
    Rato, Tiago
    Schmitt, Eric
    Hubert, Mia
    QUALITY ENGINEERING, 2016, 28 (01) : 127 - 142
  • [46] Data extraction from proteomics raw data: An evaluation of nine tandem MS tools using a large Orbitrap data set
    Mancuso, Francesco
    Bunkenborg, Jakob
    Wierer, Michael
    Molina, Henrik
    JOURNAL OF PROTEOMICS, 2012, 75 (17) : 5293 - 5303
  • [47] A statistical evaluation of the sexual dimorphism of the acetabulum in an Iberian population
    Warrier, Varsha
    San-Millan, Marta
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE, 2025, 139 (01) : 393 - 409
  • [48] Evaluation via simulation of statistical corrections for network nonindependence
    Matthews, Luke J. J.
    Schuler, Megan S. S.
    Vardavas, Raffaele
    Breslau, Joshua
    Popescu, Ioana
    HEALTH SERVICES AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2024, 24 (02) : 211 - 226
  • [49] Police evaluation of evidence: statistical format and evidence type
    Cabell, Jean J.
    Livingston, Tyler N.
    Yang, Yueran
    LAW PROBABILITY & RISK, 2024, 23 (01)
  • [50] A Statistical Comparison of Classification Algorithms on a Single Data Set
    Sibona, Christopher
    Brickey, Jonalan
    AMCIS 2012 PROCEEDINGS, 2012,