Statistical evaluation of data from tractor guidance systems

被引:10
|
作者
Dunn, Peter K. [1 ]
Powierski, Andrew P.
Hill, Rodger
机构
[1] Univ So Queensland, Australian Ctr Sustainable Catchments, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
[2] Univ So Queensland, Fac Sci, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
[3] Australian Inst Hlth & Welf, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[4] Goulburn Murray Water, Kerang, Vic 3579, Australia
关键词
accuracy; precision; guidance system; autocorrelation;
D O I
10.1007/s11119-006-9007-8
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Statistical tools are discussed for the analysis of data collected from tractor guidance systems. The importance of both accuracy and precision is discussed, and statistical tools for analysis are considered which incorporate important features of the data. In particular, accuracy is modelled using a generalized least squares model incorporating autocorrelation, and variances (inverse of precision) using a gamma generalized linear model. The methods are applied to data collected during an experiment conducted with a Trimble receiver used with a Beeline tractor guidance system. Three different scenarios are considered, then compared: a tractor simulating ploughing a field; the tractor pulling a plough with the receivers on the tractor; the tractor pulling a plough with the Trimble receiver on the plough. The change in the precision and accuracy between the scenarios is discussed. Data were recorded over repeated swaths for each scenario. After discussing specific statistical techniques for analysis of this type of data, the collected data are analysed; major conclusions are: The data from the Trimble receiver showed evidence of autocorrelation in the offsets; the plough recorded a variance about three times that recorded by the tractor.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 192
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Robust Optimization of the UAV Path Following Guidance Systems
    Tunik, Anatoly A.
    Komnatska, Marta M.
    2016 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON METHODS AND SYSTEMS OF NAVIGATION AND MOTION CONTROL (MSNMC), 2016, : 25 - 30
  • [22] Statistical analysis and accuracy of PIV data
    Ullum U.
    Schmidt J.J.
    Larsen P.S.
    McCluskey D.R.
    Journal of Visualization, 1998, 1 (2) : 205 - 216
  • [23] DATA QUALITY IN MATERIALS INFORMATION-SYSTEMS
    SARGENT, P
    COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN, 1992, 24 (09) : 477 - 490
  • [24] Evaluation of geochemical data by two different XRF spectrometers in sediments from the Santiaguillo Basin (state of Durango, Mexico)
    David Quiroz-Jimenez, Jesus
    Roy, Priyadarsi D.
    GEOFISICA INTERNACIONAL, 2017, 56 (03): : 305 - 315
  • [25] The statistical evaluation of binary tests without gold standard: Robustness of latent variable approaches
    Akkerhuis, Thomas
    de Mast, Jeroen
    Erdmann, Tashi
    MEASUREMENT, 2017, 95 : 473 - 479
  • [26] Prospects for a Statistical Theory of LC/TOFMS Data
    Ipsen, Andreas
    Ebbels, Timothy M. D.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2012, 23 (05) : 779 - 791
  • [27] The utility of auxiliary data in statistical population reconstruction
    Clawson, Michael V.
    Skalski, John R.
    Millspaugh, Joshua J.
    WILDLIFE BIOLOGY, 2013, 19 (02) : 147 - 155
  • [28] Implications of Data Anonymization on the Statistical Evidence of Disparity
    Xu, Heng
    Zhang, Nan
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2022, 68 (04) : 2600 - 2618
  • [29] Statistical models for spatially explicit biological data
    Rogers, David J.
    Sedda, Luigi
    PARASITOLOGY, 2012, 139 (14) : 1852 - 1869
  • [30] A Safe Framework for Quantitative In Vivo Human Evaluation of Image Guidance
    Cannon, Piper C.
    Ferguson, James M.
    Pitt, E. Bryn
    Shrand, Jason A.
    Setia, Shaan A.
    Nimmagadda, Naren
    Barth, Eric J.
    Kavoussi, Nicholas L.
    Galloway, Robert L.
    Herrell, S. Duke
    Webster, Robert J.
    IEEE OPEN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2024, 5 : 133 - 139