Protein-protein interaction as a predictor of subcellular location

被引:59
|
作者
Shin, Chang Jin [1 ]
Wong, Simon [1 ]
Davis, Melissa J. [1 ]
Ragan, Mark A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Inst Mol Biosci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
INTERACTION MAP; GENE ONTOLOGY; LOCALIZATION; YEAST; SEQUENCE; ANNOTATION; NETWORK; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1186/1752-0509-3-28
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Many biological processes are mediated by dynamic interactions between and among proteins. In order to interact, two proteins must co-occur spatially and temporally. As protein-protein interactions (PPIs) and subcellular location (SCL) are discovered via separate empirical approaches, PPI and SCL annotations are independent and might complement each other in helping us to understand the role of individual proteins in cellular networks. We expect reliable PPI annotations to show that proteins interacting in vivo are co-located in the same cellular compartment. Our goal here is to evaluate the potential of using PPI annotation in determining SCL of proteins in human, mouse, fly and yeast, and to identify and quantify the factors that contribute to this complementarity. Results: Using publicly available data, we evaluate the hypothesis that interacting proteins must be co-located within the same subcellular compartment. Based on a large, manually curated PPI dataset, we demonstrate that a substantial proportion of interacting proteins are in fact co-located. We develop an approach to predict the SCL of a protein based on the SCL of its interaction partners, given sufficient confidence in the interaction itself. The frequency of false positive PPIs can be reduced by use of six lines of supporting evidence, three based on type of recorded evidence (empirical approach, multiplicity of databases, and multiplicity of literature citations) and three based on type of biological evidence (inferred biological process, domain-domain interactions, and orthology relationships), with biological evidence more-effective than recorded evidence. Our approach performs better than four existing prediction methods in identifying the SCL of membrane proteins, and as well as or better for soluble proteins. Conclusion: Understanding cellular systems requires knowledge of the SCL of interacting proteins. We show how PPI data can be used more effectively to yield reliable SCL predictions for both soluble and membrane proteins. Scope exists for further improvement in our understanding of cellular function through consideration of the biological context of molecular interactions.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predicting subcellular localization of proteins using protein-protein interaction data
    Garapati, Hita Sony
    Male, Gurranna
    Mishra, Krishnaveni
    GENOMICS, 2020, 112 (03) : 2361 - 2368
  • [2] An efficient strategy for identifying essential proteins based on homology, subcellular location and protein-protein interaction information
    Zhang, Zhihong
    Luo, Yingchun
    Jiang, Meiping
    Wu, Dongjie
    Zhang, Wang
    Yan, Wei
    Zhao, Bihai
    MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 19 (06) : 6331 - 6343
  • [3] Predicting diabetes mellitus genes via protein-protein interaction and protein subcellular localization information
    Tang, Xiwei
    Hu, Xiaohua
    Yang, Xuejun
    Fan, Yetian
    Li, Yongfan
    Hu, Wei
    Liao, Yongzhong
    Zheng, Ming Cai
    Peng, Wei
    Gao, Li
    BMC GENOMICS, 2016, 17
  • [4] Plant Protein-Protein Interaction Network and Interactome
    Zhang, Yixiang
    Gao, Peng
    Yuan, Joshua S.
    CURRENT GENOMICS, 2010, 11 (01) : 40 - 46
  • [5] Detecting overlapping protein complexes in protein-protein interaction networks
    Nepusz, Tamas
    Yu, Haiyuan
    Paccanaro, Alberto
    NATURE METHODS, 2012, 9 (05) : 471 - U81
  • [6] Predicting False Positives of Protein-Protein Interaction Data by Semantic Similarity Measures
    Montanez, George
    Cho, Young-Rae
    CURRENT BIOINFORMATICS, 2013, 8 (03) : 339 - 346
  • [7] Analyzing Protein-Protein Interaction Networks
    Koh, Gavin C. K. W.
    Porras, Pablo
    Aranda, Bruno
    Hermjakob, Henning
    Orchard, Sandra E.
    JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2012, 11 (04) : 2014 - 2031
  • [8] Prediction and Analysis of the Protein-Protein Interaction Networks for Chickens, Cattle, Dogs, Horses and Rabbits
    Wang, Fen
    Song, Baoxing
    Zhao, Xing
    Miao, Yaotian
    Li, Dengyun
    Zhou, Na
    Jiang, Pengfei
    Sang, Qing
    Huang, Jingfei
    Zhang, Deli
    CURRENT BIOINFORMATICS, 2016, 11 (01) : 131 - 142
  • [9] Protein-Protein Interaction Methods and Protein Phase Separation
    Savojardo, Castrense
    Martelli, Pier Luigi
    Casadio, Rita
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOMEDICAL DATA SCIENCE, VOL 3, 2020, 2020, 3 : 89 - 112
  • [10] Reconstruction and Application of Protein-Protein Interaction Network
    Hao, Tong
    Peng, Wei
    Wang, Qian
    Wang, Bin
    Sun, Jinsheng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2016, 17 (06)