Portfolio optimization under loss aversion

被引:37
作者
Fulga, Cristinca [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Bucharest Univ Econ Studies, Dept Appl Math, Piata Romana 6, Bucharest 010374, Romania
[2] Romanian Acad, Gheorghe Mihoc Caius Jacob Inst Math Stat & Appl, Calea 13 Septembrie 13,Sect 5, Bucharest 050711, Romania
关键词
Portfolio optimization; Loss aversion; Mean-Risk model; Utility functions; PROSPECT-THEORY; STOCHASTIC-DOMINANCE; MEAN-VARIANCE; EXPECTED-UTILITY; RISK ANALYSIS; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2015.11.038
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We present an integrated methodological approach for selecting portfolios. The proposed methodology is focused on incorporation of investor's preferences in the Mean-Risk framework. We propose a risk measure calculated with the downside part of the portfolio return distribution which, we argue, captures better the practical behavior of the loss-averse investor. We establish its properties, study the link with stochastic dominance criteria, point out the relations with Conditional Value at Risk and Lower Partial Moment of first order, and give the explicit formula for the case of scenario-based portfolio optimization. The proposed methodology involves two stages: firstly, the investment opportunity set (efficient frontier) is determined, and secondly, one single preferred efficient portfolio is selected, namely the one having the highest Expected Utility value. Three classes of utility functions with loss aversion corresponding to three types of investors are considered. The empirical study is targeted on assessing the differences between the efficient frontier of the proposed model and the classical Mean-Variance, Mean-CVaR and Mean-LPM1 frontiers. We firstly analyze the loss of welfare incurred by using another model instead of the proposed one and measure the corresponding gain/loss of utility. Secondly, we assess how much the portfolios really differ in terms of their compositions using a dissimilarity index based on the 1-norm. We describe and interpret the optimal solutions obtained and emphasize the role and influence of loss aversion parameters values and of constraints. Three types of constraints are studied: no short selling allowed, a certain degree of diversification imposed, and short selling allowed. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 322
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement [J].
Abdellaoui, Mohammed ;
Bleichrodt, Han ;
Paraschiv, Corina .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 53 (10) :1659-1674
[2]   On the coherence of expected shortfall [J].
Acerbi, C ;
Tasche, D .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2002, 26 (07) :1487-1503
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Value at Risk
[4]  
[Anonymous], BEYOND VALUE AT RISK
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1947, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior
[6]   Coherent measures of risk [J].
Artzner, P ;
Delbaen, F ;
Eber, JM ;
Heath, D .
MATHEMATICAL FINANCE, 1999, 9 (03) :203-228
[7]  
ASBECK EL, 1984, LARGE SCALE SYST, V6, P13
[8]   Prospect theory and asset prices [J].
Barberis, N ;
Huang, M ;
Santos, T .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2001, 116 (01) :1-53
[9]  
Bawa V.S., 1975, J. Financ. Econ., V2, P95, DOI DOI 10.1016/0304-405X(75)90025-2
[10]   CAPITAL-MARKET EQUILIBRIUM IN A MEAN-LOWER PARTIAL MOMENT FRAMEWORK [J].
BAWA, VS ;
LINDENBERG, EB .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1977, 5 (02) :189-200