High-resolution digital soil mapping of multiple soil properties: an alternative to the traditional field survey?

被引:22
作者
Flynn, Trevan [1 ]
de Clercq, Willem [2 ]
Rozanov, Andrei [1 ]
Clarke, Cathy [1 ]
机构
[1] Stellenbosch Univ, Dept Soil Sci, Stellenbosch, South Africa
[2] Stellenbosch Univ, Stellenbosch Water Inst, Stellenbosch, South Africa
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
digital soil mapping; farm-scale; feature selection; high resolution; machine learning; FUZZY K-MEANS; SPATIAL PREDICTION; ORGANIC-MATTER; CARBON STOCKS; RANDOM FOREST; DISAGGREGATION; VARIOGRAMS; NITROGEN; REGION; MAPS;
D O I
10.1080/02571862.2019.1570566
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Spatial information on soil particle size distribution and soil organic carbon (SOC) are important for land-use management, environmental models and policy-making. Digital soil mapping (DSM) techniques can quantitatively predict these soil properties using minimal resources. However, DSM has not been adequately evaluated at the farm-scale. The aim of this study was to optimise the DSM framework to produce farm-scale soil maps for 366 ha in the Sandspruit catchment, Western Cape, South Africa. Four feature selection techniques and eight predictive models were evaluated on their ability to predict particle size distribution and SOC. A boosted linear feature selection produced the highest accuracy for all but one soil property. The top-performing predictive models were robust linear models for gravel (ridge regression, RMSE 9.01%, R (2) 0.75), sand (support vector machine, RMSE 4.69%, R (2) 0.67), clay (quantile regression, RMSE 2.38%, R (2) 0.52) and SOC (ridge regression, RMSE 0.19%, R (2) 0.41). Random forest was the best predictive model for silt content (RMSE 4.12%, R (2) 0.53). This approach appears to be robust for farm-scale soil mapping where the number of observations is often small but high-resolution soil data are required.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 247
页数:11
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Mapping soil carbon stocks across Scotland using a neural network model [J].
Aitkenhead, M. J. ;
Coull, M. C. .
GEODERMA, 2016, 262 :187-198
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Keys to Soil Taxonomy
[3]   Mapping topsoil physical properties at European scale using the LUCAS database [J].
Ballabio, Cristiano ;
Panagos, Panos ;
Monatanarella, Luca .
GEODERMA, 2016, 261 :110-123
[4]   Effects of iron and organic matter on the porosity and structural stability of soil aggregates [J].
Barral, MT ;
Arias, M ;
Guerif, J .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 1998, 46 (3-4) :261-272
[5]   Quantifying the Aspect Effect: An Application of Solar Radiation Modeling for Soil Survey (vol 73, pg 1345, 2009) [J].
Beaudette, D. E. ;
O'Geen, A. I. .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2009, 73 (05) :1755-1755
[6]   Digital soil mapping using artificial neural networks [J].
Behrens, T ;
Förster, H ;
Scholten, T ;
Steinrücken, U ;
Spies, ED ;
Goldschmitt, M .
JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2005, 168 (01) :21-33
[7]   Multi-scale digital terrain analysis and feature selection for digital soil mapping [J].
Behrens, Thorsten ;
Zhu, A-Xing ;
Schmidt, Karsten ;
Scholten, Thomas .
GEODERMA, 2010, 155 (3-4) :175-185
[8]   A comparison of prediction methods for the creation of field-extent soil property maps [J].
Bishop, TFA ;
McBratney, AB .
GEODERMA, 2001, 103 (1-2) :149-160
[9]   Machine learning for predicting soil classes in three semi-arid landscapes [J].
Brungard, Colby W. ;
Boettinger, Janis L. ;
Duniway, Michael C. ;
Wills, Skye A. ;
Edwards, Thomas C., Jr. .
GEODERMA, 2015, 239 :68-83
[10]  
Bui EN, 2000, HYDROL PROCESS, V14, P237, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(20000215)14:2<237::AID-HYP922>3.0.CO