Increased Risk of Developing Breast Cancer after a False-Positive Screening Mammogram

被引:29
作者
Henderson, Louise M. [1 ,2 ]
Hubbard, Rebecca A. [3 ]
Sprague, Brian L. [4 ,5 ]
Zhu, Weiwei [6 ]
Kerlikowske, Karla [7 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Radiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Univ Penn, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Vermont, Dept Surg, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[5] Univ Vermont, Off Hlth Promot Res, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[6] Grp Hlth Res Inst, Seattle, WA USA
[7] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[8] Univ Calif San Francisco, Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA USA
[9] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Vet Affairs, Gen Internal Med Sect, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
DENSITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; OUTCOMES; BIOPSY; COHORT; WOMEN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0623
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Women with a history of a false-positive mammogram result may be at increased risk of developing subsequent breast cancer. Methods: Using 1994 to 2009 Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium data, we included women ages 40 to 74 years with a screening mammogram that resulted in a false-positive with recommendation for additional imaging, false-positive with recommendation for biopsy, or true-negative with no cancer within one year following the examination. We used partly conditional Cox proportional hazards survival models to assess the association between a false-positive mammogram result and subsequent breast cancer, adjusting for potential confounders. Adjusted survival curves stratified by breast density and false-positive result were used to evaluate changes in risk over time. Results: During 12,022,560 person-years of follow-up, 48,735 cancers were diagnosed. Compared with women with a true-negative examination, women with a false-positive with additional imaging recommendation had increased risk of developing breast cancer [adjusted HR (aHR) = 1.39; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.35-1.44] as did women with a false-positive with a biopsy recommendation (aHR = 1.76; 95% CI, 1.65-1.88). Results stratifying by breast density were similar to overall results except among women with almost entirely fatty breasts in which aHRs were similar for both the false-positive groups. Women with a false-positive result had persistently increased risk of developing breast cancer 10 years after the false-positive examination. Conclusion/Impact: Women with a history of a false-positive screening mammogram or biopsy recommendation were at increased risk of developing breast cancer for at least a decade, suggesting that prior false-positive screening may be useful in risk prediction models. (C) 2015 AACR.
引用
收藏
页码:1882 / 1889
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Breast imaging reporting and data system
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Breast Cancer Facts Figures 2013-2014
[3]   Breast cancer surveillance consortium: A national mammography screening and outcomes database [J].
BallardBarbash, R ;
Taplin, SH ;
Yankaskas, BC ;
Ernster, VL ;
Rosenberg, RD ;
Carney, PA ;
Barlow, WE ;
Geller, BM ;
Kerlikowske, K ;
Edwards, BK ;
Lynch, CF ;
Urban, N ;
Key, CR ;
Poplack, SP ;
Worden, JK ;
Kessler, LG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (04) :1001-1008
[4]   Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography [J].
Barlow, William E. ;
White, Emily ;
Ballard-Barbash, Rachel ;
Vacek, Pamela M. ;
Titus-Ernstoff, Linda ;
Carney, Patricia A. ;
Tice, Jeffrey A. ;
Buist, Diana S. M. ;
Geller, Berta M. ;
Rosenberg, Robert ;
Yankaskas, Bonnie C. ;
Kerlikowske, Karla .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (17) :1204-1214
[5]   Breast cancer detection risk in screening mammography after a false-positive result [J].
Castells, X. ;
Roman, M. ;
Romero, A. ;
Blanch, J. ;
Zubizarreta, R. ;
Ascunce, N. ;
Salas, D. ;
Buron, A. ;
Sala, M. .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 37 (01) :85-90
[6]   Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories [J].
Ciatto, S ;
Houssami, N ;
Apruzzese, A ;
Bassetti, E ;
Brancato, B ;
Carozzi, F ;
Catarzi, S ;
Lamberini, MP ;
Marcelli, G ;
Pellizzoni, R ;
Pesce, B ;
Risso, G ;
Russo, F ;
Scorsolini, A .
BREAST, 2005, 14 (04) :269-275
[7]   Detection of breast cancer after biopsy for false-positive screening mammography. An increased risk? [J].
Groenendijk, RPR ;
Kochen, MPG ;
van Engelenburg, KCA ;
Boetes, C ;
Strobbe, LJA ;
Ruers, TJM ;
Wobbes, T .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 27 (01) :17-20
[8]   False-positive results in mammographic screening for breast cancer in Europe: a literature review and survey of service screening programmes [J].
Hofvind, Solveig ;
Ponti, Antonio ;
Patnick, Julietta ;
Ascunce, Nieves ;
Njor, Sisse ;
Broeders, Mireille ;
Giordano, Livia ;
Frigerio, Alfonso ;
Tornberg, Sven .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2012, 19 :57-66
[9]   Cumulative Probability of False-Positive Recall or Biopsy Recommendation After 10 Years of Screening Mammography A Cohort Study [J].
Hubbard, Rebecca A. ;
Kerlikowske, Karla ;
Flowers, Chris I. ;
Yankaskas, Bonnie C. ;
Zhu, Weiwei ;
Miglioretti, Diana L. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 155 (08) :481-U46
[10]   Outcomes of Screening Mammography by Frequency, Breast Density, and Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy [J].
Kerlikowske, Karla ;
Zhu, Weiwei ;
Hubbard, Rebecca A. ;
Geller, Berta ;
Dittus, Kim ;
Braithwaite, Dejana ;
Wernli, Karen J. ;
Miglioretti, Diana L. ;
O'Meara, Ellen S. .
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 173 (09) :807-816