EFFECTS OF EPISTASIS ON INFECTIVITY RANGE DURING HOST-PARASITE COEVOLUTION

被引:13
作者
Ashby, Ben [1 ]
Gupta, Sunetra [1 ]
Buckling, Angus [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Zool, Oxford OX1 3PS, England
[2] Univ Exeter, Exeter TR10 9FE, Devon, England
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Epistasis; generalism; host-parasite coevolution; infectivity range; multiple mutations; resistance; GENE-FOR-GENE; ANTAGONISTIC COEVOLUTION; LOCAL ADAPTATION; RESISTANCE; PHAGE; EVOLUTION; DYNAMICS; BACTERIOPHAGE; POPULATION; SUSCEPTIBILITY;
D O I
10.1111/evo.12479
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Understanding how parasites adapt to changes in host resistance is crucial to evolutionary epidemiology. Experimental studies have demonstrated that parasites are more capable of adapting to gradual, rather than sudden changes in host phenotype, as the latter may require multiple mutations that are unlikely to arise simultaneously. A key, but as yet unexplored factor is precisely how interactions between mutations (epistasis) affect parasite evolution. Here, we investigate this phenomenon in the context of infectivity range, where parasites may experience selection to infect broader sets of genotypes. When epistasis is strongly positive, we find that parasites are unlikely to evolve broader infectivity ranges if hosts exhibit sudden, rather than gradual changes in phenotype, in close agreement with empirical observations. This is due to a low probability of fixing multiple mutations that individually confer no immediate advantage. When epistasis is weaker, parasites are more likely to evolve broader infectivity ranges if hosts make sudden changes in phenotype, which can be explained by a balance between mutation supply and selection. Thus, we demonstrate that both the rate of phenotypic change in hosts and the form of epistasis between mutations in parasites are crucial in shaping the evolution of infectivity range.
引用
收藏
页码:2972 / 2982
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [21] The genetics of infectious disease susceptibility: has the evidence for epistasis been overestimated?
    Hall, Matthew D.
    Ebert, Dieter
    [J]. BMC BIOLOGY, 2013, 11
  • [22] SEX VERSUS NON-SEX VERSUS PARASITE
    HAMILTON, WD
    [J]. OIKOS, 1980, 35 (02) : 282 - 290
  • [23] Mechanisms of avian retroviral host range extension
    Jonah, G
    Rainey, A
    Natonson, A
    Maxfield, LF
    Coffin, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, 2003, 77 (12) : 6709 - 6719
  • [24] Kisdi E, 2006, EVOL ECOL RES, V8, P959
  • [25] Advice of the rose: Experimental coevolution of a trematode parasite and its snail host
    Koskella, Britt
    Lively, Curtis M.
    [J]. EVOLUTION, 2007, 61 (01) : 152 - 159
  • [26] Bacteriophage resistance mechanisms
    Labrie, Simon J.
    Samson, Julie E.
    Moineau, Sylvain
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 8 (05) : 317 - 327
  • [27] LENSKI RE, 1984, GENETICS, V107, P1
  • [28] Population and evolutionary dynamics of phage therapy
    Levin, BR
    Bull, JJ
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 2 (02) : 166 - 173
  • [29] Repeatability and Contingency in the Evolution of a Key Innovation in Phage Lambda
    Meyer, Justin R.
    Dobias, Devin T.
    Weitz, Joshua S.
    Barrick, Jeffrey E.
    Quick, Ryan T.
    Lenski, Richard E.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2012, 335 (6067) : 428 - 432
  • [30] Coevolution of bacteriophage PP01 and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in continuous culture
    Mizoguchi, K
    Morita, M
    Fischer, CR
    Yoichi, M
    Tanji, Y
    Unno, H
    [J]. APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 69 (01) : 170 - 176