Painful bone metastasis in elderly treated with radiation therapy: Single- or multiple-fraction regimen? A multicentre retrospective observational analysis

被引:4
作者
Falivene, S. [1 ]
Pezzulla, D. [2 ]
Di Franco, R. [1 ]
Giugliano, F. M. [3 ]
Esposito, E. [4 ,5 ]
Scoglio, C. [2 ]
Amato, B. [5 ]
Borzillo, V. [1 ]
D'Aiuto, M. [4 ]
Muto, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS, Fdn Giovanni Pascale, Ist Nazl Studio & Cura Tumori, Div Radiat Oncol, Via Mariano Semmola, I-80131 Naples, Italy
[2] Univ Naples 2, Piazza Miraglia, I-80131 Naples, Italy
[3] Fdn Mutoonlus, European Med Imaging Radiat Oncol, Via Taverna Rossa 169, I-80020 Naples, Italy
[4] IRCCS, Fdn Giovanni Pascale, Ist Nazl Studio & Cura Tumori, Dept Breast Canc, Via Mariano Semmola, I-80131 Naples, Italy
[5] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Clin Med & Surg, Via Pansini 5, I-80131 Naples, Italy
关键词
Bone metastases; Elderly; Radiation therapy; Single-fraction regimen; ILLNESS RATING-SCALE; PALLIATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; FAMILY-PRACTICE; TRIALS; LIFE;
D O I
10.1007/s40520-016-0671-x
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background Bone metastases are a frequent complication of advanced oncologic disease. Pain associated to bone metastasis is a major cause of morbidity in cancer patients, especially in elderly. Aims The aim of this multicentric retrospective observational study is to evaluate the efficacy of different schedules of radiation therapy in elderly patients in terms of pain relief. Methods 206 patients over the age of 60 were enrolled in 1 year time for a multicentre retrospective observational study. Patients were treated with palliative purposes for painful bone metastases. Results Pain intensity difference (PID) was found in 72% of patients. Reported PID was statistically significant for p < 0.01. Pain intensity measured by a point numeric rating scale was statistically significant reduced for p < 0.05 by one-fraction regimen compared to other two regimens. Discussion In recent years, numerous studies have evaluated the most appropriate regimen of fractionation in individual cases, despite this, a consensus about the best schedule is still debated. Conclusions On our analysis, single-fractionation scheme (8 Gy) confirmed to be statistical significant effective in providing pain reduction due to bone metastases. Radiation therapy provides significant pain relief of symptomatic bone metastases, but appropriate radiotherapy scheduled is needed in order to get significant response to treatment. Multidisciplinary approach is warranted to value the balance between the therapeutic objectives and the patient quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:S143 / S147
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases - Implications for pay for performance
    Boyd, CM
    Darer, J
    Boult, C
    Fried, LP
    Boult, L
    Wu, AW
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (06): : 716 - 724
  • [2] Palliative radiotherapy trials for bone metastases: A systematic review
    Chow, Edward
    Harris, Kristin
    Fan, Grace
    Tsao, May
    Sze, Wai M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (11) : 1423 - 1436
  • [3] Ciaglia G, 2014, WORLD J ONCOL, V7, P57
  • [4] How to measure comorbidity: a critical review of available methods
    de Groot, V
    Beckerman, H
    Lankhorst, GJ
    Bouter, LM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (03) : 221 - 229
  • [5] How well do elderly people complete individualised quality of life measures: An exploratory study
    Dempster, M
    Donnelly, M
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2000, 9 (04) : 369 - 375
  • [6] Di Franco R., 2013, INTERVENTIONAL NEURO, P221
  • [7] Di Franco R, 2014, ANTICANCER RES, V34, P1011
  • [8] Prevalence of multimorbidity among adults seen in family practice
    Fortin, M
    Bravo, G
    Hudon, C
    Vanasse, A
    Lapointe, L
    [J]. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2005, 3 (03) : 223 - 228
  • [9] Giugliano FM, 2014, J PALLIAT CARE MED, V4, P5
  • [10] Hoegler David, 1997, Current Problems in Cancer, V21, P129, DOI 10.1016/S0147-0272(97)80004-9