A systems science perspective on the capacity for change in public hospitals

被引:17
作者
Braithwaite, J. [1 ]
Westbrook, J. [2 ]
Coiera, E. [3 ]
Runciman, W. B. [4 ]
Day, R. [5 ]
Hillman, K. [6 ,7 ]
Herkes, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Ctr Healthcare Resilience & Implementat Sci, Australian Inst Hlth Innovat, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
[2] Macquarie Univ, Ctr Hlth Syst & Safety Res, Australian Inst Hlth Innovat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Macquarie Univ, Ctr Hlth Informat, Australian Inst Hlth Innovat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ South Australia, Ctr Populat Hlth Res, Sch Hlth Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Univ New South Wales, St Vincents Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Univ New South Wales, Simpson Ctr Hlth Serv Res, South Western Sydney Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW 7, Australia
[7] Liverpool Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
Health systems; Complexity science; Systems science; Organisational change; Public health; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s13584-017-0143-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Many types of organisation are difficult to change, mainly due to structural, cultural and contextual barriers. Change in public hospitals is arguably even more problematic than in other types of hospitals, due to features such as structural dysfunctionalities and bureaucracy stemming from being publicly-run institutions. The main goals of this commentary are to bring into focus and highlight the "3 + 3 Decision Framework" proposed by Edwards and Saltman. This aims to help guide policymakers and managers implementing productive change in public hospitals. However, while change from the top is popular, there are powerful front-line clinicians, especially doctors, who can act to counterbalance top-down efforts. Front-line clinicians have cultural characteristics and power that allows them to influence or reject managerial decisions. Clinicians in various lower-level roles can also influence other clinicians to resist or ignore management requirements. The context is further complicated by multi-stakeholder agendas, differing goals, and accumulated inertia. The special status of clinicians, along with other system features of public hospitals, should be factored into efforts to realise major system improvements and progressive change.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Allen D., 2016, SOCIOLOGY HEALTHCARE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, The management of innovation
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, RESILIENT HLTH CARE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care
[5]   Restructuring as gratification [J].
Braithwaite, J ;
Westbrook, J ;
Iedema, R .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2005, 98 (12) :542-544
[6]   A tale of two hospitals: assessing cultural landscapes and compositions [J].
Braithwaite, J ;
Westbrook, MT ;
Iedema, R ;
Mallock, NA ;
Forsyth, R ;
Zhang, K .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2005, 60 (05) :1149-1162
[7]   Towards safer, better healthcare: harnessing the natural properties of complex sociotechnical systems [J].
Braithwaite, J. ;
Runciman, W. B. ;
Merry, A. F. .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2009, 18 (01) :37-41
[8]  
Braithwaite J, 2011, HEALTHCARE MANAGEMEN, P592
[9]  
Braithwaite Jeffrey, 2004, Health Serv Manage Res, V17, P141, DOI 10.1258/0951484041485629
[10]  
Braithwaite Jeffrey, 2005, J Health Serv Res Policy, V10, P10