The influence of criterion shifts on electrophysiological correlates of recognition memory

被引:53
作者
Azimian-Faridani, N. [1 ]
Wilding, E. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Sch Psychol, Cardiff CF10 3AT, S Glam, Wales
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
D O I
10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1075
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The claim that event-related potential, (ERPs) index family was assessed by acquiring ERPs during. recognition memory task in which participants were instructed to adopt different decision criteria in separate retrieval phases. In one. Me instructions were to respond "old" only when confident that this was the correct response. and to respond otherwise (the conservative condition). In the other the instructions were to respond new only when confident that this was the correct response (the liberal condition). The rationale for this approach was that the level of familiarity licensing an old response would he higher in the conservative than in the liberal condition, and if ERPs index Familiarity. this would be reflected in changes to the putative ERP index. This index comprises relatively more positive-going neural activity for correct judgments to old than to new items. which is evident from 300 to 500 msec poststimulus at mid-frontal scalp locations. In keeping with task instructions. participants made more old responses in the liberal than in the conservative condition. There were reliable mid-frontal FRP old new effects in both conditions, and the ERPs evoked by correct judgments to word: in the conservative condition were relatively more positive-going than those in the liberal condition. This finding is cousistent with the view din the mid-frontal ERP old new effect indexes familiarity. and in combination with other I:RP findings provides strong support for dual-process accounts of recognition memory.
引用
收藏
页码:1075 / 1086
页数:12
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   Sparing of the familiarity component of recognition memory in a patient with hippocampal pathology [J].
Aggleton, JP ;
Vann, SD ;
Denby, C ;
Dix, S ;
Mayes, AR ;
Roberts, N ;
Yonelinas, AP .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2005, 43 (12) :1810-1823
[2]  
Aggleton JP, 1999, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V22, P425
[3]  
[Anonymous], COGNITIVE NEUROSCIEN
[4]   An event-related potential study of the revelation effect [J].
Azimian-Faridani, N ;
Wilding, EL .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2004, 11 (05) :926-931
[5]   Effects of attention and confidence on the hypothesized ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity [J].
Curran, T .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2004, 42 (08) :1088-1106
[6]   Brain potentials reflect behavioral differences in true and false recognition [J].
Curran, T ;
Schacter, DL ;
Johnson, MK ;
Spinks, R .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 13 (02) :201-216
[7]   ERP old/new effects at different retention intervals in recency discrimination tasks [J].
Curran, T ;
Friedman, WJ .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2004, 18 (02) :107-120
[8]   Using ERPs to dissociate recollection from familiarity in picture recognition [J].
Curran, T ;
Cleary, AM .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2003, 15 (02) :191-205
[9]   Differentiating amodal familiarity from modality-specific memory processes: An ERP study [J].
Curran, T ;
Dien, J .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 40 (06) :979-988
[10]   Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity [J].
Curran, T .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2000, 28 (06) :923-938