Glove perforation in outpatient dermatologic surgery

被引:14
作者
Dirschka, T
Winter, K
Kralj, N
Hofmann, F
机构
[1] Dermatol Practice Ctr, Wuppertal, Germany
[2] Univ Witten Herdecke, Dept Expt Dermatol, Witten, Germany
[3] Univ Wuppertal, Chair Occupat Med & Infect Protect, Wuppertal, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30375.x
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Intact surgical gloves ensure protection of health-care employees and health-care recipients. Nevertheless, glove perforation is very common and puncture rates above 50% have been published in the literature. OBJECTIVE. It was our aim to evaluate the perforation rate of surgical gloves in outpatient dermatologic surgery. METHODS. Six-hundred and sixty latex surgical gloves used in outpatient dermatologic surgery were evaluated for perforations using the approved water-leak method. Perforations were analyzed microscopically. RESULTS. Twenty of the 660 gloves were found to have perforations, which corresponds to a perforation rate of 3.0%. Only 5 of these perforations (25%) were noticed by the wearer. Perforations were more numerous in nondominant-handed gloves. Microscopically, all perforations could be identified as needle stick injuries. CONCLUSION. The risk of glove perforation in outpatient dermatologic surgery is lower than in many other medical specialties. The relatively high number of surgical procedures performed successively in outpatient dermatologic surgery, however, emphasizes the decisive relevance of an intact barrier between surgeon and patient. In view of the major fact that most perforations go unnoticed by the wearer, dermatologic surgeons must balance the improved safety of double gloving with costs and the loss of sensitivity and dexterity.
引用
收藏
页码:1210 / 1213
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   FREQUENCY OF GLOVE PERFORATIONS AND SUBSEQUENT BLOOD CONTACT IN ASSOCIATION WITH SELECTED OBSTETRIC SURGICAL-PROCEDURES [J].
CHAPMAN, S ;
DUFF, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1993, 168 (05) :1354-1357
[2]   EFFICACY OF DOUBLE GLOVING AS A PROTECTION AGAINST BLOOD EXPOSURE IN DERMATOLOGICAL SURGERY [J].
COHEN, MS ;
DO, JT ;
TAHERY, DP ;
MOY, RL .
JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY AND ONCOLOGY, 1992, 18 (10) :873-874
[3]  
DODDS RDA, 1988, BRIT J SURG, V75, P966
[4]   Surgical glove perforation in cardiac surgery [J].
Driever, R ;
Beie, M ;
Schmitz, E ;
Holland, M ;
Knapp, M ;
Reifschneider, HJ ;
Hofmann, F ;
Vetter, HO .
THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2001, 49 (06) :328-330
[5]   SURGICAL GLOVE PERFORATION IN DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY [J].
GROSS, DJ ;
JAMISON, Y ;
MARTIN, K ;
FIELDS, M ;
DINEHART, SM .
JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY AND ONCOLOGY, 1989, 15 (11) :1226-1228
[6]  
Hasselhorn HM, 2000, CHIRURG, V71, P389, DOI 10.1007/s001040051070
[7]   SURGICAL GLOVE PERFORATION RATES IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY [J].
HILL, J ;
MORRISSEY, MSC ;
ALUNJONES, T .
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1989, 14 (06) :495-496
[8]   The integrity of surgical gloves during gynaecological operations [J].
Khoo, SK ;
Isbester, A .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 39 (03) :357-359
[9]  
Kralj N, 1999, Gesundheitswesen, V61, P398
[10]   Perforation rates for nonsterile examination gloves in routine dermatologic procedures [J].
Kupres, K ;
Rasmussen, SE ;
Albertini, JG .
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2002, 28 (05) :388-389