The prognostic significance of the prognostic nutritional index in cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:357
作者
Sun, Kaiyu [1 ]
Chen, Shuling [2 ]
Xu, Jianbo [1 ]
Li, Guanghua [1 ]
He, Yulong [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Div Gastrointestinal Surg, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Div Gastroenterol, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Prognostic nutritional index; Cancer; Prognosis; Meta-analysis; GASTRIC-CANCER; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES; PREDICT; SCORES; RATIO;
D O I
10.1007/s00432-014-1714-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is a simple and effective parameter, initially created to evaluate preoperative nutritional conditions and surgical risk. It has been recently been found to be associated with short- and long-term outcomes of various malignancies. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the predictive significance of PNI in cancer, as a mean to assist in determining the optimal surgery timing and in improving the survival of cancer patients. Data were retrieved from PubMed and ISI Web of Science to identify eligible studies. Odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were extracted and pooled to explore the relationships of PNI with patient survival and clinicopathological features. Fourteen studies with a total of 3,414 participants met the inclusion criteria. Low PNI was associated with poor overall survival (pooled OR 1.80, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.59-2.04) and the presence of post-operative complications (pooled OR 2.45, 95 % CI 1.31-4.58) in cancer patients, but not with cancer-specific survival (CSS) (pooled HR 1.81, 95 % CI 0.94-3.49). PNI was also found to be associated with invasion depth (pooled OR 5.07, 95 % CI 2.34-10.96) and lymph node metastasis (pooled OR 3.70, 95 % CI 2.32-5.92) in gastric cancer, whereas TNM stage was the only clinicopathological feature associated with PNI in colorectal carcinoma (pooled OR 1.81, 95 % CI 1.24-2.64). PNI might be an effective predictive indicator for the prognosis of cancer, especially digestive system carcinomas. Further studies are required to verify the significance of PNI in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1537 / 1549
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], WORLD J SURG
[2]   Preoperative platelet lymphocyte ratio as an independent prognostic marker in ovarian cancer [J].
Asher, Viren ;
Lee, Joanne ;
Innamaa, Anni ;
Bali, Anish .
CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 13 (07) :499-503
[3]   OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF A BANK CORRELATION TEST FOR PUBLICATION BIAS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
MAZUMDAR, M .
BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) :1088-1101
[4]   PROGNOSTIC NUTRITIONAL INDEX IN GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY [J].
BUZBY, GP ;
MULLEN, JL ;
MATTHEWS, DC ;
HOBBS, CL ;
ROSATO, EF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1980, 139 (01) :160-167
[5]   Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio predicts chemotherapy outcomes in patients with advanced colorectal cancer [J].
Chua, W. ;
Charles, K. A. ;
Baracos, V. E. ;
Clarke, S. J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 104 (08) :1288-1295
[6]   Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Schneider, M ;
Minder, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109) :629-634
[7]   Significance of the prognostic nutritional index in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [J].
Feng, Ji-Feng ;
Chen, Qi-Xun .
THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2014, 10 :1-7
[8]   Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses [J].
Higgins, JPT ;
Thompson, SG ;
Deeks, JJ ;
Altman, DG .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7414) :557-560
[9]   Nutritional predictors of postoperative outcome in pancreatic cancer [J].
Kanda, M. ;
Fujii, T. ;
Kodera, Y. ;
Nagai, S. ;
Takeda, S. ;
Nakao, A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (02) :268-274
[10]   Comparison of the prognostic value of inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma [J].
Kinoshita, A. ;
Onoda, H. ;
Imai, N. ;
Iwaku, A. ;
Oishi, M. ;
Fushiya, N. ;
Koike, K. ;
Nishino, H. ;
Tajiri, H. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 107 (06) :988-993