Remarkable differences between copper-based sulfides and iron-based sulfides for the adsorption of high concentrations of gaseous elemental mercury: Mechanisms, kinetics, and significance

被引:22
作者
Hu, Qixing [1 ]
Wang, Chang [1 ]
Geng, Yang [1 ]
Zhang, Xufan [1 ]
Mei, Jian [1 ]
Yang, Shijian [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangnan Univ, Sch Environm & Civil Engn, Wuxi 214122, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Hg-0; adsorption; desorption; Cu-based sulfides; Fe-based sulfides; Kinetics; RECYCLABLE MAGNETIC SORBENT; FLUE-GAS; ATMOSPHERIC MERCURY; EMISSIONS; REMOVAL; HG(II); FLOW; XPS; FE; SPECIATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcis.2020.08.067
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Copper sulfides (CuSx) and iron sulfides (FeSx) have been developed to capture gaseous elemental mercury (Hg-0) originating from the smelting flue gas. However, these compounds exhibit different Hg-0 adsorption characteristics and Hg species adsorbed on CuSx can be spontaneously released as gaseous Hg-0. Following these findings, the adsorption/desorption kinetics of Hg-0 onto and from FeSx and CuSx were determined. After comparing the kinetic parameters, the mechanisms behind some of the remarkable differences between FeSx and CuSx with respect to Hg-0 adsorption were discovered. The Cu-S bond in CuSx was not completely broken during Hg-0 oxidation, but the S-S bond in FeSx was. Hence, the activation energy for the oxidation of Hg-0 physically adsorbed on CuSx was much lower than that for FeSx, resulting in a much higher efficiency of CuSx to oxidize Hg-0 than FeSx. However, the bond strength of Hg-S for HgS on CuSx was weaker due to the sharing of S2- in HgS with Cu+, resulting in a decrease in the thermal stability of HgS on CuSx. Therefore, HgS adsorbed on Cu-based sulfides was metastable, and could be spontaneously decomposed to release moderate concentrations of gaseous Hg-0, which was not preferable for capturing high concentrations of Hg-0. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 590
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] XPS and XAS study of the sorption of Hg(II) onto pyrite
    Behra, P
    Bonnissel-Gissinger, P
    Alnot, M
    Revel, R
    Ehrhardt, JJ
    [J]. LANGMUIR, 2001, 17 (13) : 3970 - 3979
  • [2] Ehrhardt JJ, 2000, SURF INTERFACE ANAL, V30, P269, DOI 10.1002/1096-9918(200008)30:1<269::AID-SIA758>3.0.CO
  • [3] 2-N
  • [4] Three-Dimensionally Ordered Macroporous Iron Oxide for Removal of H2S at Medium Temperatures
    Fan, Hui-Ling
    Sun, Ting
    Zhao, Yan-Peng
    Ju Shangguan
    Lin, Jian-Ying
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (09) : 4859 - 4865
  • [5] Novel sorbents for mercury removal from flue gas
    Granite, EJ
    Pennline, HW
    Hargis, RA
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2000, 39 (04) : 1020 - 1029
  • [6] Reactive iron sulfide (FeS)-supported ultrafiltration for removal of mercury (Hg(II)) from water
    Han, Dong Suk
    Orillano, Maria
    Khodary, Ahmed
    Duan, Yuhang
    Batchelor, Bill
    Abdel-Wahab, Ahmed
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2014, 53 : 310 - 321
  • [7] Adsorption and Oxidation of Elemental Mercury over Ce-MnOx/Ti-PILCs
    He, Chuan
    Shen, Boxiong
    Chen, Jianhong
    Cai, Ji
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (14) : 7891 - 7898
  • [8] Mercury pollution in China
    Jiang, Gui-Bin
    Shi, Jian-Bo
    Feng, Xin-Bin
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 40 (12) : 3672 - 3678
  • [9] DOE/NETL's phase II mercury control technology field testing program: Preliminary economic analysis of activated carbon injection
    Jones, Andrew P.
    Hoffmann, Jeffrey W.
    Smith, Dennis N.
    Feeley, Thomas J., III
    Murphy, James T.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 41 (04) : 1365 - 1371
  • [10] Outstanding Resistance of H2S-Modified Cu/TiO2 to SO2 for Capturing Gaseous Hg0 from Nonferrous Metal Smelting Flue Gas: Performance and Reaction Mechanism
    Kong, Lingnan
    Zou, Sijie
    Mei, Jian
    Geng, Yang
    Zhao, Hui
    Yang, Shijian
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 52 (17) : 10003 - 10010