LeFort III internal distraction in syndromic craniosynostosis

被引:46
作者
Holmes, AD
Wright, GW
Meara, JG
Heggie, AA
Probert, TC
机构
[1] Royal Childrens Hosp, Melbourne Craniofacial Unit, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Sch Dent Sci, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00001665-200203000-00014
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Distraction osteogenesis of the mid-face alleviates the requirements of substantial autogenous bone grafts and donor site morbidity and alleviates the restriction of the soft-tissue envelope in gaining advancement of the mid-face. A prospective study, over a 14-month period, was initiated to evaluate the results of seven consecutive patients undergoing mid-facial advancement who were treated with Le Fort III internal distraction using the MID device. All patients had syndromic craniosynostoses and six patients had previously undergone fronto-orbital advancement. Four patients had symptoms of airway obstruction and one patient was tracheostomy dependent. Six of the patients completed the distraction as planned. Lateral cephalograms were analyzed and the mean linear distraction was 18 mm with a range of 8 mm to 23 mm. Complications included infection (one patient), mechanical failure (one patient), intraoperative fragment dysjunction (three patients), velopharyngeal insufficiency (one patient), conjunctivitis (two patients), trismus (six patients), and bony irregularities. It was concluded that in our Unit's future protocol for managing infant syndromic synostoses, synostectomies and cranial vault remodeling will be undertaken in infants as before, but that in early childhood, patients with severe mid-facial hypoplasia and/or respiratory compromise will be offered distraction osteogenesis as a substitute for the traditional Le Fort III advancement and bone grafting.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 272
页数:11
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Le Fort III advancement with gradual distraction using internal devices [J].
Chin, M ;
Toth, BA .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1997, 100 (04) :819-830
[2]  
Codivilla A., 1905, AM J ORTHOP SURG, V2, P353, DOI [10.1007/s11999-008-0518-7, DOI 10.1007/S11999-008-0518-7]
[3]   Monobloc and facial bipartition distraction with internal devices [J].
Cohen, SR ;
Boydston, W ;
Hudgins, R ;
Burstein, FD .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 1999, 10 (03) :244-251
[4]   Craniofacial distraction with a modular interval distraction system: Evolution of design and surgical techniques [J].
Cohen, SR .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1999, 103 (06) :1592-1607
[5]   The Le Fort III osteotomy: To distract or not to distract? [J].
Fearon, JA .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 107 (05) :1091-1103
[6]   THE TENSION STRESS EFFECT ON THE GENESIS AND GROWTH OF TISSUES .1. THE INFLUENCE OF STABILITY OF FIXATION AND SOFT-TISSUE PRESERVATION [J].
ILIZAROV, GA .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1989, (238) :249-281
[7]   LENGTHENING THE HUMAN MANDIBLE BY GRADUAL DISTRACTION [J].
MCCARTHY, JG ;
SCHREIBER, J ;
KARP, N ;
THORNE, CH ;
GRAYSON, BH .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1992, 89 (01) :1-8
[8]   Rigid external distraction: Its application in cleft maxillary deformities [J].
Polley, JW ;
Figueroa, AA .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1998, 102 (05) :1360-1372
[9]   Management of severe maxillary deficiency in childhood and adolescence through distraction osteogenesis with an external, adjustable, rigid distraction device [J].
Polley, JW ;
Figueroa, AA .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 1997, 8 (03) :181-185