Benchmarking nuclear models for Gamow-Teller response

被引:46
作者
Litvinova, E. [1 ,2 ]
Brown, B. A. [2 ,3 ]
Fang, D. -L. [2 ,4 ]
Marketin, T. [5 ]
Zegers, R. G. T. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Western Michigan Univ, Dept Phys, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Natl Superconducting Cyclotron Lab, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[4] Michigan State Univ, Joint Inst Nucl Astrophys, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[5] Univ Zagreb, Fac Sci, Dept Phys, Zagreb 41000, Croatia
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
MEAN-FIELD THEORY; NEUTRON-DEFICIENT NUCLEI; SHELL-MODEL; STRENGTH FUNCTIONS; BETA-DECAY; FRAGMENTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.physletb.2014.02.001
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
A comparative study of the nuclear Gamow-Teller response (GTR) within conceptually different state-of-the-art approaches is presented. Three nuclear microscopic models are considered: (i) the recently developed charge-exchange relativistic time blocking approximation (RTBA) based on the covariant density functional theory, (ii) the shell model (SM) with an extended "jj77" model space and (iii) the non-relativistic quasiparticle random-phase approximation (QRPA) with a Brueckner G-matrix effective interaction. We study the physics cases where two or all three of these models can be applied. The Gamow-Teller response functions are calculated for Pb-208, Sn-132 and Ni-78 within both RTBA and QRPA. The strengths obtained for 208Pb are compared to data that enable a firm model benchmarking. For the nucleus 132Sn, also SM calculations are performed within the model space truncated at the level of a particle-hole (ph) coupled to vibration configurations. This allows a consistent comparison to the RTBA where ph circle times phonon coupling is responsible for the spreading width and considerable quenching of the GTR. Differences between the models and perspectives of their future developments are discussed. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 313
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
ARIMA A, 1987, ADV NUCL PHYS, V18, P1
[2]   The r-process of stellar nucleosynthesis: Astrophysics and nuclear physics achievements and mysteries [J].
Arnould, M. ;
Goriely, S. ;
Takahashi, K. .
PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, 2007, 450 (4-6) :97-213
[3]   The AME2003 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references [J].
Audi, G ;
Wapstra, AH ;
Thibault, C .
NUCLEAR PHYSICS A, 2003, 729 (01) :337-676
[4]   Gamow-Teller strength and the spin-isospin coupling constants of the Skyrme energy functional [J].
Bender, M ;
Dobaczewski, J ;
Engel, J ;
Nazarewicz, W .
PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 2002, 65 (05) :543221-5432219
[5]   Building a universal nuclear energy density functional [J].
Bertsch, G. F. .
SCIDAC 2007: SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY THROUGH ADVANCED COMPUTING, 2007, 78
[6]   NUCLEAR FIELD-THEORY [J].
BORTIGNON, PF ;
BROGLIA, RA ;
BES, DR ;
LIOTTA, R .
PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, 1977, 30 (04) :305-360
[7]  
BORZOV IN, 1990, SOV J NUCL PHYS+, V52, P627
[8]   The nuclear shell model towards the drip lines [J].
Brown, B. A. .
PROGRESS IN PARTICLE AND NUCLEAR PHYSICS, VOL 47, 2001, 47 (02) :517-599
[9]   New Skyrme interaction for normal and exotic nuclei [J].
Brown, BA .
PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 1998, 58 (01) :220-231
[10]  
BROWN BA, 1988, ANNU REV NUCL PART S, V38, P29