Green Process Innovation and Financial Performance in Emerging Economies: Moderating Effects of Absorptive Capacity and Green Subsidies

被引:219
作者
Xie, Xuemei [1 ]
Huo, Jiage [1 ]
Qi, Guoyou [2 ]
Zhu, Kevin Xiaoguo [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ, Sch Management, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
[2] E China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Rady Sch Management, San Diego, CA 92093 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Absorptive capacity; emerging economies; financial performance; green process innovation; green subsidies; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; END-OF-PIPE; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; ECO-INNOVATION; PANEL-DATA; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; MANAGEMENT; DETERMINANTS; CHINA;
D O I
10.1109/TEM.2015.2507585
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Being "green" is socially, desirable, yet whether it pays to be "green" is unclear. This question has become more important to manufacturing industries as environmental concerns are escalating, particularly in emerging economies. We examine the effects of green process innovation on the financial performance of manufacturing industries with a focus on the moderating effects of government subsidies versus industries' own absorptive capability. Using sulfur dioxide emissions as an environmental index, we establish a dynamic model using ten years panel data from 28 industries in China where environmental concerns have been severe and government subsidies have been commonly believed to be instrumental. The results show that clean technologies and end-of-pipe technologies are positively related to financial performance at the industry level, thus it pays to be "green." Furthermore, strong absorptive capacity tends to enhance this relationship, but surprisingly green subsidies turn out to weaken this relationship. We also find the effects are different between clean technologies and end-of-pile technologies, which leads to finer grained insights into these two types of technologies and their adoption. We conclude that manufacturing industries can benefit more from green process innovation by leveraging their internal absorptive capability, as opposed to replying on external government subsidies as commonly believed. Our findings provide finer grained insights on the benefits of green process innovation, and shed light on the study of green process innovation in other emerging economies.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 112
页数:12
相关论文
共 71 条
[51]  
Porter M., 1991, SCI AM, V264, P97
[52]   TOWARD A NEW CONCEPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT-COMPETITIVENESS RELATIONSHIP [J].
PORTER, ME ;
VANDERLINDE, C .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1995, 9 (04) :97-118
[53]   A soft-systems methodology approach for product and process innovation [J].
Presley, A ;
Sarkis, J ;
Liles, DH .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2000, 47 (03) :379-392
[54]   Revisiting the relationship between environmental and financial performance in Chinese industry [J].
Qi, G. Y. ;
Zeng, S. X. ;
Shi, Jonathan J. ;
Meng, X. H. ;
Lin, H. ;
Yang, Q. X. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 145 :349-356
[55]   The influence of different characteristics of the EU environmental management and auditing scheme on technical environmental innovations and economic performance [J].
Rennings, K ;
Ziegler, A ;
Ankele, K ;
Hoffmann, E .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 57 (01) :45-59
[56]   Redefining innovation - eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics [J].
Rennings, K .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 32 (02) :319-332
[57]   A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability [J].
Russo, MV ;
Fouts, PA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1997, 40 (03) :534-559
[58]   An empirical evaluation of environmental efficiencies and firm performance: Pollution prevention versus end-of-pipe practice [J].
Sarkis, J ;
Cordeiro, JJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2001, 135 (01) :102-113
[59]   Environmental risk management and the cost of capital [J].
Sharfman, Mark P. ;
Fernando, Chitru S. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2008, 29 (06) :569-592
[60]  
Siegel DS, 2009, ACAD MANAGE PERSPECT, V23, P5