Observational Constraints on Warm Cloud Microphysical Processes Using Machine Learning and Optimization Techniques

被引:16
作者
Chiu, J. Christine [1 ]
Yang, C. Kevin [1 ]
van Leeuwen, Peter Jan [1 ,2 ]
Feingold, Graham [3 ]
Wood, Robert [4 ]
Blanchard, Yann [5 ]
Mei, Fan [6 ]
Wang, Jian [7 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Atmospher Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Univ Reading, Dept Meteorol, Reading, Berks, England
[3] NOAA, Earth Syst Res Lab, Boulder, CO USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Atmospher Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Univ Quebec, Dept Earth & Atmospher Sci, ESCER Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Richland, WA 99352 USA
[7] Washington Univ, Dept Energy Environm & Chem Engn, Ctr Aerosol Sci & Engn, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
accretion; autoconversion; boundary layer cloud; cloud parameterization; machine learning; warm rain; BOUNDARY-LAYER CLOUDS; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; PARAMETERIZATION; DRIZZLE; MODEL; AUTOCONVERSION; REPRESENTATION; SIMULATION; TURBULENCE; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1029/2020GL091236
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
We introduce new parameterizations for autoconversion and accretion rates that greatly improve representation of the growth processes of warm rain. The new parameterizations capitalize on machine-learning and optimization techniques and are constrained by in situ cloud probe measurements from the recent Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program field campaign at Azores. The uncertainty in the new estimates of autoconversion and accretion rates is about 15% and 5%, respectively, outperforming existing parameterizations. Our results confirm that cloud and drizzle water content are the most important factors for determining accretion rates. However, for autoconversion, in addition to cloud water content and droplet number concentration, we discovered a key role of drizzle number concentration that is missing in current parameterizations. The robust relation between autoconversion rate and drizzle number concentration is surprising but real, and furthermore supported by theory. Thus, drizzle number concentration should be considered in parameterizations for improved representation of the autoconversion process. Plain Language Summary Drizzle has been a key element of research, because its formation modulates cloud properties and evolution, and affects the water cycle of the Earth. Since drizzle formation involves cloud droplets of all sizes, it requires extensive computational time. Hence, we often use simplified methods in weather and climate prediction models to obtain a bulk estimate of how fast and how many cloud droplets collide with each other or collide with bigger drops to form drizzle. However, many models continue to have inadequate representation of drizzle formation, calling for the need to improve these simplified methods. We introduce new methods to estimate the rate of those microphysical processes, capitalizing on aircraft measurements and recent advances in machine-learning techniques. Our techniques outperform the current methods significantly. Importantly, our analyses reveal that the rate of drizzle formation via collisions between cloud drops is related to drizzle drop number concentration itself, which is missing in the existing methods. This relation occurs because drizzle drop number concentration provides information on the stage of evolution of cloud size distribution during drizzle formation. Although this is not a causal relationship, it is important to incorporate this relation into models for better prediction of drizzle formation. Key Points . Machine-learning trained by in situ data constrains autoconversion and accretion rates with uncertainty of 15% and 5%, respectively There is a surprising relation between autoconversion rate and drizzle number concentration that significantly improves parameterizations The exponent of autoconversion rate dependence on cloud number concentration is 0.75, lower than that in existing parameterizations
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   An improved representation of the raindrop size distribution for single-moment microphysics schemes [J].
Abel, S. J. ;
Boutle, I. A. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 138 (669) :2151-2162
[2]   Improving the Representation of Low Clouds and Drizzle in the ECMWF Model Based on ARM Observations from the Azores [J].
Ahlgrimm, Maike ;
Forbes, Richard .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2014, 142 (02) :668-685
[3]   Effects of turbulence on the geometric collision rate of sedimenting droplets. Part 1. Results from direct numerical simulation [J].
Ayala, Orlando ;
Rosa, Bogdan ;
Wang, Lian-Ping ;
Grabowski, Wojciech W. .
NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2008, 10
[4]   A parameterization of warm cloud microphysical conversion processes [J].
Beheng, K. D. .
ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 1994, 33 (1-4) :193-206
[5]  
Berry E.X., 1968, 1st Natl. Conf. on Weather Modification, Amer. Meteor. Soc., Albany, P81
[6]   Evaluating cloud systems in the Met Office global forecast model using simulated CloudSat radar reflectivities [J].
Bodas-Salcedo, A. ;
Webb, M. J. ;
Brooks, M. E. ;
Ringer, M. A. ;
Williams, K. D. ;
Milton, S. F. ;
Wilson, D. R. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2008, 113
[7]   A LIMITED MEMORY ALGORITHM FOR BOUND CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION [J].
BYRD, RH ;
LU, PH ;
NOCEDAL, J ;
ZHU, CY .
SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 1995, 16 (05) :1190-1208
[8]   Turbulence Effects of Collision Efficiency and Broadening of Droplet Size Distribution in Cumulus Clouds [J].
Chen, Sisi ;
Yau, M. K. ;
Bartello, Peter .
JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2018, 75 (01) :203-217
[9]  
COTTON WR, 1972, MON WEATHER REV, V100, P764, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1972)100<0764:NSOPDI>2.3.CO
[10]  
2