Should We Reintroduce Previous Venous Thromboembolism Into Decision-Making for Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation?

被引:1
|
作者
Overvad, Thure Filskov [1 ,2 ]
Skjoth, Flemming [1 ,3 ]
Albertsen, Ida Ehlers [1 ,4 ]
Larsen, Torben Bjerregaard [1 ,4 ]
Sogaard, Mette [1 ,4 ]
Lip, Gregory Y. H. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Fac Hlth, Dept Clin Med, Aalborg Thrombosis Res Unit, Aalborg, Denmark
[2] North Denmark Reg Hosp, Dept Med, Hjorring, Denmark
[3] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Unit Clin Biostat, Aalborg, Denmark
[4] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Aalborg, Denmark
[5] Univ Liverpool, Liverpool Ctr Cardiovasc Sci, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[6] Liverpool Heart & Chest Hosp, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
关键词
Atrial fibrillation; Risk stratification; Venous thromboembolism; Stroke; Anticoagulation; PULMONARY-EMBOLISM; ANTITHROMBOTIC THERAPY; TREATMENT THRESHOLDS; STROKE PREVENTION; PREDICTING STROKE; ESC GUIDELINES; RISK-FACTOR; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSES; HEART;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.05.042
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate whether history of venous thromboembolism should be considered a prognostic factor for future thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS: This was a nationwide cohort study of patients with incident atrial fibrillation from 2000-2017, defined and characterized using Danish health registries. Cox regression analyses were used to calculate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the outcomes ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, and ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, or venous thromboembolism, according to history of venous thromboembolism. Analyses were adjusted for components of the CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score and time-varying use of oral anticoagulation. RESULTS: The study included 246,313 patients with incident atrial fibrillation, of which 6,516 (2.6%) had previous venous thromboembolism. Patients with previous venous thromboembolism carried an overall similar adjusted risk of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism compared with patients without previous venous thromboembolism (reference; hazard ratio 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.09). When analyzing a composite thromboembolic outcome of ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, or venous thromboembolism, patients with previous venous thromboembolism were at high-risk (hazard ratio 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.64-1.90). Similar conclusions were drawn when stratifying by venous thromboembolism subtype, and when restricting to patients with low CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc scores or the non-anticoagulated subset of the study population. CONCLUSION: Patients with atrial fibrillation and previous venous thromboembolism carried similar risk of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism compared with patients with atrial fibrillation without previous venous thromboembolism. Nonetheless, patients with previous venous thromboembolism remain a high-risk population due to an excess risk of future venous thromboembolism. Patients and physicians should keep this excess thromboembolic risk in mind when weighing the expected risks and benefits of oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / +
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Oral anticoagulation therapy and subsequent risk of venous thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation patients
    Lutsey, Pamela L.
    Norby, Faye L.
    Zakai, Neil A.
    MacLehose, Richard F.
    Chen, Lin Y.
    Shah, Surbhi
    Datta, Yvonne H.
    Alonso, Alvaro
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2019, 35 (05) : 837 - 845
  • [2] Anticoagulation risk assessment for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism: A clinical review
    Pallazola, Vincent A.
    Kapoor, Rishi K.
    Kapoor, Karan
    McEvoy, John W.
    Blumenthal, Roger S.
    Gluckman, Ty J.
    VASCULAR MEDICINE, 2019, 24 (02) : 141 - 152
  • [3] Consensus Clinical Decision-Making Factors Driving Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation
    King, Philip K.
    Fosnight, Susan M.
    Bishop, Jeffrey R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 124 (07) : 1038 - 1043
  • [4] Decision-Making in the Management of Venous Thromboembolism
    Ellis, Martin H.
    Avnery, Orly
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2021, 134 (03) : 317 - 325
  • [5] Shared Decision-Making for Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation: Do Physicians Really Listen?
    Siegal, Deborah M.
    Healey, Jeff S.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 36 (04) : 459 - 461
  • [6] Shared Decision Making in Atrial Fibrillation Where We Are and Where We Should Be Going
    Seaburg, Luke
    Hess, Erik P.
    Coylewright, Megan
    Ting, Henry H.
    McLeod, Christopher J.
    Montori, Victor M.
    CIRCULATION, 2014, 129 (06) : 704 - 710
  • [7] Decision aids for shared decision-making and appropriate anticoagulation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Song, Dan
    Zhou, Jie
    Fan, Tianli
    Chang, Jing
    Qiu, Yuzhen
    Zhuang, Zexiang
    Ma, Juanjuan
    Zeng, Li
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2022, 21 (02) : 97 - 106
  • [8] Informed Decision Making for Anticoagulation Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation
    Martinez, Kathryn A.
    Linfield, Debra T.
    Shaker, Victoria
    Rothberg, Michael B.
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2023, 43 (02) : 263 - 269
  • [9] Oral Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation: Development and Evaluation of a Mobile Health Application to Support Shared Decision-Making
    Stephan, Laura Siga
    Almeida, Eduardo Dytz
    Guimaraes, Raphael Boesche
    Ley, Antonio Gaudie
    Mathias, Rodrigo Goncalves
    Assis, Maria Valeria
    Luz Leiria, Tiago Luiz
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2018, 110 (01) : 7 - 14
  • [10] Anticoagulation Decision-Making in ICH Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Quality-Adjusted Decision Model Outcomes
    Kleindorfer, Dawn O.
    Mark, Eckman
    Moomaw, Charles J.
    Stanton, Robert
    Haverbusch, Mary
    Flaherty, Matthew L.
    Woo, Daniel
    STROKE, 2018, 49