Drug-related problems in general practice: results from a development project in Denmark

被引:20
作者
Soendergaard, Birthe [1 ]
Kirkeby, Bente
Dinsen, Christine
Herborg, Hanne
Kjellberg, Jakob
Staehr, Peter
机构
[1] Danish Univ Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Pharmacol & Pharmacotherapy, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Danish Coll Pharm Practice, Hillerod, Denmark
[3] DSI, Copenhagen, Denmark
来源
PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE | 2006年 / 28卷 / 02期
关键词
community pharmacist; general practice; medication review; drug-related problems; acceptance rate; implementation rate; Denmark;
D O I
10.1007/s11096-006-9008-8
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective The objective of the study is identify and document drug-related problems and other possible quality problems in primary care through a pharmacist-run medication review and screening service. GPs' acceptance and implementation rates of the pharmacist's recommendations are evaluated. Method A community pharmacist worked 20 h per week for 18 months in a GP practice with three GPs. Results The pharmacist completed 40 reviews and identified 103 drug-related problems. GPs had a high rate of acceptance of the pharmacist's suggested interventions (83%), and 77% of the recommendations had been implemented. 765 (12.5%) possible quality problems were identified after screening 6094 medical records. The physicians accepted 86% of the recommendations to initiate low dosage ASA and treatment was implemented for 63% of the patients. 76% of the recommendations to initiate Statin treatment were agreed on and 56% were implemented. Conclusion The pharmacist was able to identify drug-related problems and other possible quality problems with regard to quality assurance of individual patient's drug treatment. The GPs accepted and implemented the pharmacist's recommendations. It was feasible to implement the services and to establish well-functioning co-operation between the pharmacist and the GPs.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 64
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], BMJ, DOI DOI 10.1006/JMBI.2001.5029
[2]  
Geoghegan M, 1998, PHARM J, V261, P864
[3]  
Grymonpre RE, 2001, INT J PHARM PRACT, V9, P235, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.2042-7174.2001.TB01054.X
[4]  
Kassam R, 2001, J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash), V41, P401
[5]   Pharmacist-led medication review in patients over 65: a randomized, controlled trial in primary care [J].
Krska, J ;
Cromarty, JA ;
Arris, F ;
Jamieson, D ;
Hansford, D ;
Duffus, PRS ;
Downie, G ;
Seymour, DG .
AGE AND AGEING, 2001, 30 (03) :205-211
[6]  
OXMAN AD, 1995, CAN MED ASSOC J, V153, P1423
[7]  
Petty DR., 2002, INT J PHARM PRACT, V10, P39, DOI [10.1111/j.2042-7174.2002.tb00586.x, DOI 10.1111/J.2042-7174.2002.TB00586.X]
[8]  
Sellors J, 2003, CAN MED ASSOC J, V169, P17
[9]   Improving primary care in rural Alabama with a pharmacy initiative [J].
Taylor, CT ;
Byrd, DC ;
Krueger, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2003, 60 (11) :1123-1129
[10]  
TEAL S, 2002, INT J PHARM PRACT, V10, P185