Comparison of the Limberg flap and bilateral gluteus maximus advancing flap following oblique excision for the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease

被引:6
|
作者
Yildar, Murat [1 ]
Cavdar, Faruk [2 ]
机构
[1] Balikesir Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Sch Med, Balikesir, Turkey
[2] Yalova State Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Yalova, Turkey
关键词
Pilonidal sinus; Limberg flap; Oblique excision; Advancing flap; Socioeconomic level; MODIFIED PRIMARY CLOSURE; RECURRENCE RATE; KARYDAKIS FLAP; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00595-013-0764-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study was performed to compare the use of a bilateral gluteus maximus advancing flap (BGMAF) following oblique incision, which was recently described for the surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus (SPS) disease, with the widely used Limberg flap (LF) technique following a rhomboid incision. A total of 105 patients treated for SPS were evaluated retrospectively. The patients were evaluated in terms of their age, body mass index, symptoms, length of the operation, complications, postoperative hospital stay, time to return to work, postoperative cosmetic satisfaction and recurrence rate. Fifty-six of the patients were treated with BGMAF, while 49 were treated with LF. The mean follow-up was 20.5 +/- A 5.4 months. The mean length of the operation, hospital stay and time to return to work were shorter, while the cosmetic satisfaction score was higher in the BGMAF group compared to the LF group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for the other criteria. The BGMAF appears to be superior to the LF in terms of the length of the operation, time to return to work and degree of cosmetic satisfaction. It is preferable for sinuses not to require wide excision, while the LF is more appropriate for sinuses with a large post-excision defect.
引用
收藏
页码:1828 / 1833
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the Limberg flap and bilateral gluteus maximus advancing flap following oblique excision for the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease
    Murat Yildar
    Faruk Cavdar
    Surgery Today, 2014, 44 : 1828 - 1833
  • [2] Management of Pilonidal Sinus Disease with Oblique Excision and Bilateral Gluteus Maximus Fascia Advancing Flap: Result of 278 Patients
    Krand, Osman
    Yalti, Tunc
    Berber, Ibrahim
    Kara, V. Melih
    Tellioglu, Gurkan
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2009, 52 (06) : 1172 - 1177
  • [3] Bilateral Gluteus Maximus Fasciocutaneous Flap For the Treatment of Complicated Pilonidal Sinus
    Yilmaz, Sezgin
    Sancaktar, Nazli
    Kosar, Mehmet Nuri
    Demir, Yavuz
    TRAKYA UNIVERSITESI TIP FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2008, 25 (03): : 233 - 235
  • [4] Comparison of Limberg Flap and Modified Limberg Flap in the Surgical Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus
    Aren, Acar
    Sagban, Alper Dursun
    Gokce, Aylin Hande
    ISTANBUL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 11 (04): : 149 - 153
  • [5] Comparison of the Keystone flap and the Limberg flap technique in the surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease
    Calisir, Akin
    Ece, Ilhan
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2021, 73 (06) : 2341 - 2346
  • [6] Comparison of the Keystone flap and the Limberg flap technique in the surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease
    Akin Calisir
    Ilhan Ece
    Updates in Surgery, 2021, 73 : 2341 - 2346
  • [7] Comparison of Limberg and Dufourmentel flap in surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease
    Tardu, Ali
    Haslak, Adnan
    Ozcinar, Beyza
    Basak, Fatih
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 27 (01) : 35 - 40
  • [8] Rhomboid excision with Limberg Flap a novel treatment for Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus
    Shabir, Faisal
    Khan, Bahzad Akram
    Azeem, Muhammad
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2014, 8 (03): : 687 - 690
  • [9] Gluteus maximus musculocutaneous flap for the treatment of recalcitrant pilonidal disease
    Rosen, W
    Davidson, JSD
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1996, 37 (03) : 293 - 297
  • [10] GLUTEUS MAXIMUS MYOCUTANEOUS FLAP FOR THE TREATMENT OF RECALCITRANT PILONIDAL DISEASE
    PEREZGURRI, JA
    TEMPLE, WJ
    KETCHAM, AS
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1984, 27 (04) : 262 - 264