Interpretation of Free-Field Ground Movements Caused by Mechanized Tunnel Construction

被引:21
作者
Ieronymaki, Evangelia S. [1 ]
Whittle, Andrew J. [2 ]
Simic Sureda, Davor [3 ]
机构
[1] Manhattan Coll, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 4513 Manhattan Coll Pkwy, Riverdale, NY 10471 USA
[2] MIT, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] Ferrovial Agroman, Geotechnol, 42 Calle Ribera del Loira, Madrid 28042, Spain
关键词
CONSTITUTIVE MODEL; SETTLEMENT; CLAYS;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001632
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
This paper summarizes greenfield ground movements caused by the construction of twin 7.1-m-diameter tunnels for London's Crossrail project using earth pressure balance (EPB) tunnel boring machines (TBM). The data include surface deformations from a series of transects in Hyde Park together with subsurface data from one well-instrumented test section. Although far-field ground movements can be well-fitted using established empirical methods or simplified analytical solutions (elastic half-space), nonlinear, inelastic soil behavior is expected to affect measurements close to the tunnel. This paper considers the effects of constitutive behavior on the observed ground movements. Simple [Mohr-Coulomb (M-C)] and more-complex (MIT-S1) soil models are calibrated using results of high-quality laboratory element tests on intact London clay. The models are then used in two-dimensional (2D) numerical simulations in order to optimize three independent cavity-deformation parameters that control the spatial distribution of ground movements associated with the passage of each EPB machine. Simulations using the MIT-S1 model find maximum radial deformations at the crown of the tunnel with very small movements at the soffit, while M-C analyses show minimum deformations closer to the springline. The analyses consistently show that larger volume losses occur for the second, eastbound (EB) tunnel bore [Delta V-L/V-0 = 0.9-1.0% compared to 0.72-0.79 for prior westbound (WB)]. This result may be attributed in part to differences in EPB control parameters and/or interactions between the two tunnels that are not considered in the current analyses. (C) 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1982, TUNNELING, DOI DOI 10.1016/0148-9062(83)91768-0
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1969, P 7 INT C SOIL MECH
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1969, THESIS
[4]  
Bowers KH, 2006, GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTS OF UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION IN SOFT GROUND, P203
[5]  
Buscarnera G, 2012, CAN GEOTECH J, V49, P499, DOI [10.1139/T2012-010, 10.1139/t2012-010]
[6]  
Founta V., 2016, P 2016 WORLD TUNN C
[7]  
Freeman T. J., 1991, P 4 INT C GROUND MOV, P485
[8]   The stiffness of natural London Clay [J].
Gasparre, A. ;
Nishimura, S. ;
Minh, N. A. ;
Coop, M. R. ;
Jardine, R. J. .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 2007, 57 (01) :33-47
[9]  
Gasparre A, 2005, THESIS
[10]  
GCG (Geotechnical Consulting Group, 2010, 1D0101G0G0000550 GCG