On solar cycle predictions and reconstructions

被引:42
作者
Brajsa, R. [1 ]
Woehl, H. [2 ]
Hanslmeier, A. [3 ]
Verbanac, G. [4 ]
Ruzdjak, D. [1 ]
Cliver, E. [5 ]
Svalgaard, L. [6 ]
Roth, M. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zagreb, Fac Geodesy, Hvar Observ, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
[2] Kiepenheuer Inst Sonnenphys, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
[3] Graz Univ, Inst Phys, IGAM, A-8010 Graz, Austria
[4] Univ Zagreb, Fac Sci, Inst Geophys, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
[5] USAF, Space Vehicles Directorate, Res Lab, Hanscom AFB, MA USA
[6] Stanford Univ, HEPL, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[7] Max Planck Inst Sonnensyst Forsch, D-37191 Katlenburg Lindau, Germany
关键词
Sun:; activity; MAXIMUM SUNSPOT NUMBER; FLUX-TRANSPORT DYNAMO; MAUNDER MINIMUM; AMPLITUDE; SOLAR-CYCLE-24; VARIABILITY; PRECURSOR; GROWTH; CONSEQUENCES; FLUCTUATIONS;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361:200810862
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Context. Generally, there are two procedures for solar cycle predictions: the empirical methods - statistical methods based on extrapolations and precursor methods - and methods based on dynamo models. Aims. The goal of the present analysis is to forecast the strength and epochs of the next solar cycle, to investigate proxies for grand solar minima and to reconstruct the relative sunspot number in the Maunder minimum. Methods. We calculate the asymmetry of the ascending and descending solar cycle phases (Method 1) and use this parameter as a proxy for solar activity on longer time scales. Further, we correlate the relative sunspot numbers in the epochs of solar activity minima and maxima (Method 2) and estimate the parameters of an autoregressive moving average model (ARMA, Method 3). Finally, the power spectrum of data obtained with the Method 1 is analysed and the Methods 1 and 3 are combined. Results. Signatures of the Maunder, Dalton and Gleissberg minima were found with Method 1. A period of about 70 years, somewhat shorter than the Gleissberg period was identified in the asymmetry data. The maximal smoothed monthly sunspot number during the Maunder minimum was reconstructed and found to be in the range 0-35 (Method 1). The estimated Wolf number (also called the relative sunspot number) of the next solar maximum is in the range 88-102 (Method 2). Method 3 predicts the next solar maximum between 2011 and 2012 and the next solar minimum for 2017. Also, it forecasts the relative sunspot number in the next maximum to be 90 +/- 27. A combination of the Methods 1 and 3 gives for the next solar maximum relative sunspot numbers between 78 and 99. Conclusions. The asymmetry parameter provided by Method 1 is a good proxy for solar activity in the past, also in the periods for which no relative sunspot numbers are available. Our prediction for the next solar cycle No. 24 is that it will be weaker than the last cycle, No. 23. This prediction is based on various independent methods.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 861
页数:7
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   For how long will the current grand maximum of solar activity persist? [J].
Abreu, J. A. ;
Beer, J. ;
Steinhilber, F. ;
Tobias, S. M. ;
Weiss, N. O. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2008, 35 (20)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, The Role of the Sun in Climate Change
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, SUN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, SOLAR ASTRONOMY HDB
[5]   Solar variability over the past several millennia [J].
Beer, J. ;
Vonmoos, M. ;
Muscheler, R. .
SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2006, 125 (1-4) :67-79
[6]  
Brockwell P.J., 1996, INTRO TIME SERIES FO
[7]   On predicting the solar cycle using mean-field models [J].
Bushby, Paul J. ;
Tobias, Steven M. .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 661 (02) :1289-1296
[8]   A robust correlation between growth rate and amplitude of solar cycles:: Consequences for prediction methods [J].
Cameron, R. ;
Schuessler, M. .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 685 (02) :1291-1296
[9]   Solar cycle prediction using precursors and flux transport models [J].
Cameron, R. ;
Schuessler, M. .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 659 (01) :801-811
[10]  
CARBONELL M, 1994, ASTRON ASTROPHYS, V290, P983