Commitment Without Marriage Union Formation Among Long-Term Same-Sex Couples

被引:58
作者
Reczek, Corinne [1 ]
Elliott, Sinikka [2 ]
Umberson, Debra
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Sociol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] N Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
commitment; commitment ceremony; gay; lesbian; same-sex marriage; UNITED-STATES; COHABITATION; TRENDS; GAY;
D O I
10.1177/0192513X09331574
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
The majority of Americans will marry in their lifetimes, and for many, marriage symbolizes the transition into long-term commitment. However, many Americans cannot legally marry. This article analyzes in-depth interviews with gays and lesbians in long-term partnerships to examine union formation and commitment-making histories. Using a life course perspective that emphasizes historical and biographical contexts, the authors examine how couples conceptualize and form committed relationships despite being denied the right to marry. Although previous studies suggest that commitment ceremonies are a way to form same-sex unions, this study finds that because of their unique social, historical, and biographical relationship to marriage and ceremonies, long-term same-sex couples do not follow normative commitment-making trajectories. Instead, relationships can transition more ambiguously to committed formations without marriage, public ceremony, clear-cut act, or decision. Such an understanding of commitment making outside of marriage has implications for theorizing alternative forms of union making.
引用
收藏
页码:738 / 756
页数:19
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Brokerage and Closure
[2]  
[Anonymous], SOCIOLOGICAL PERSPEC
[3]   The ties that bind: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage [J].
Brines, J ;
Joyner, K .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1999, 64 (03) :333-355
[4]   Cohabitation versus marriage: A comparison of relationship quality [J].
Brown, SL ;
Booth, A .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY, 1996, 58 (03) :668-678
[5]   Trends in cohabitation and implications for children's family contexts in the United States [J].
Bumpass, L ;
Lu, HH .
POPULATION STUDIES-A JOURNAL OF DEMOGRAPHY, 2000, 54 (01) :29-41
[6]  
Casper L., 2001, CONTINUITY CHANGE AM
[7]   The Deinstitutionalization of American marriage [J].
Cherlin, AJ .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY, 2004, 66 (04) :848-861
[8]   Diversity within lesbians and gay families: Challenges and implications for family theory and research [J].
Demo, DH ;
Allen, KR .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 1996, 13 (03) :415-434
[9]  
Elder G.H., 1991, The Encyclopedia of Sociology, P281
[10]  
ELDER GH, 2002, SOC DEV CLIN PERSPEC, P153