Ductal Lavage Is an Inefficient Method of Biomarker Measurement in High-Risk Women

被引:9
作者
Khan, Seema A. [1 ]
Lankes, Heather A. [2 ]
Patil, Deepa B. [3 ]
Bryk, Michele [1 ]
Hou, Nanjiang [2 ]
Ivancic, David [1 ]
Nayar, Ritu [3 ]
Masood, Shahla [4 ]
Rademaker, Alfred [2 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Surg, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Prevent Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Pathol, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Pathol, Jacksonville, FL USA
关键词
FINE-NEEDLE-ASPIRATION; BREAST-CANCER RISK; KI-67; EXPRESSION; PREVENTION; MASTECTOMY; PREDICTION; TISSUE; CELLS;
D O I
10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0119
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Effective methods of serial epithelial sampling to measure breast-specific biomarkers will aid the rapid evaluation of new preventive interventions. We report here a proof-of-principle phase 2 study to assess the utility of ductal lavage (DL) to measure biomarkers of tamoxifen action. We enrolled women with a 5-year breast cancer risk estimate > 1.6% or the unaffected breast of women with T(1a) or T(1b) breast cancer. After entry DL, participants chose tamoxifen or observation and underwent repeat DL 6 months later. Samples were processed for cytology and immunohistochemistry for estrogen receptor a, Ki-67, and cyclooxygenase-2. Of 182 women recruited, 115 (63%) underwent entry and repeat DL; 85 (47%) had sufficient cells for analysis from >= 1 duct at both time points; in 78 (43%), cells were sufficient from >= 1 matched ducts. Forty-six women chose observation and 39 chose tamoxifen. We observed greater reductions in the tamoxifen group than in the observation group for Ki-67 (adjusted P = 0.03) and estrogen receptor a (adjusted P = 0.07), but not in cyclooxygenase-2 (adjusted P = 0.4) labeling. Cytologic findings showed a trend toward improvement in the tamoxifen group compared with the observation group. Interobserver variability for cytologic diagnosis between two observers showed good agreement (. = 0.44). Using DL, we observed the expected changes in tamoxifen-related biomarkers; however, poor reproducibility of biomarkers in the observation group, the 53% attrition rate of subjects from recruitment to biomarker analyses, and the expense of DL are significant barriers to the use of this procedure for biomarker assessment over time.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 273
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Comparison of ductal lavage and random periareolar fine needle aspiration as tissue acquisition methods in early breast cancer prevention trials [J].
Arun, Banu ;
Valero, Vicente ;
Logan, Catherine ;
Broglio, Kristine ;
Rivera, Edgardo ;
Brewster, Abenaa ;
Yin, Guosheng ;
Green, Marjorie ;
Kuerer, Henry ;
Gong, Yun ;
Browne, Doris ;
Hortobagyi, Gabriel N. ;
Sneige, Nour .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 13 (16) :4943-4948
[2]   INFLUENCE OF MENSTRUAL-CYCLE, PARITY AND ORAL-CONTRACEPTIVE USE ON STEROID-HORMONE RECEPTORS IN NORMAL BREAST [J].
BATTERSBY, S ;
ROBERTSON, BJ ;
ANDERSON, TJ ;
KING, RJB ;
MCPHERSON, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1992, 65 (04) :601-607
[3]   Endocrine biomarkers in ductal lavage samples from women at high risk for breast cancer [J].
Bhandare, D ;
Nayar, R ;
Bryk, M ;
Hou, NJ ;
Cohn, R ;
Golewale, N ;
Parker, NP ;
Chatterton, RT ;
Rademaker, A ;
Khan, SA .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2005, 14 (11) :2620-2627
[4]   Expression of the estrogen receptor gene in developing and adult human breast [J].
Boyd, MT ;
Hildebrandt, RH ;
Bartow, SA .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1996, 37 (03) :243-251
[5]   Ductal lavage in patients undergoing mastectomy for mammary carcinoma - A correlative study [J].
Brogi, E ;
Robson, M ;
Panageas, KS ;
Casadio, C ;
Ljung, BM ;
Montgomery, L .
CANCER, 2003, 98 (10) :2170-2176
[6]   Atypia and Ki-67 expression from ductal lavage in women at different risk for breast cancer [J].
Cazzaniga, Massimiliano ;
Severi, Gianluca ;
Casadio, Chiara ;
Chiapparini, Laura ;
Veronesi, Umberto ;
Decensi, Andrea .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2006, 15 (07) :1311-1315
[7]  
CLAUS EB, 1994, CANCER, V73, P643, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19940201)73:3<643::AID-CNCR2820730323>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-5
[9]   METHODS FOR COMPARING EVENT RATES IN INTERVENTION STUDIES WHEN THE UNIT OF ALLOCATION IS A CLUSTER [J].
DONNER, A ;
KLAR, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 140 (03) :279-289
[10]  
Fabian CJ, 2002, CLIN CANCER RES, V8, P3105