The effect of genomic information on optimal contribution selection in livestock breeding programs

被引:59
作者
Clark, Samuel A. [1 ,2 ]
Kinghorn, Brian P. [2 ]
Hickey, John M. [2 ]
van der Werf, Julius H. J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
[2] Univ New England, CRC Sheep Ind Innovat, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
关键词
GENETIC-RELATIONSHIP INFORMATION; PREDICTION; IMPACT; GAIN; VALUES;
D O I
10.1186/1297-9686-45-44
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Background: Long-term benefits in animal breeding programs require that increases in genetic merit be balanced with the need to maintain diversity (lost due to inbreeding). This can be achieved by using optimal contribution selection. The availability of high-density DNA marker information enables the incorporation of genomic data into optimal contribution selection but this raises the question about how this information affects the balance between genetic merit and diversity. Methods: The effect of using genomic information in optimal contribution selection was examined based on simulated and real data on dairy bulls. We compared the genetic merit of selected animals at various levels of co-ancestry restrictions when using estimated breeding values based on parent average, genomic or progeny test information. Furthermore, we estimated the proportion of variation in estimated breeding values that is due to within-family differences. Results: Optimal selection on genomic estimated breeding values increased genetic gain. Genetic merit was further increased using genomic rather than pedigree-based measures of co-ancestry under an inbreeding restriction policy. Using genomic instead of pedigree relationships to restrict inbreeding had a significant effect only when the population consisted of many large full-sib families; with a half-sib family structure, no difference was observed. In real data from dairy bulls, optimal contribution selection based on genomic estimated breeding values allowed for additional improvements in genetic merit at low to moderate inbreeding levels. Genomic estimated breeding values were more accurate and showed more within-family variation than parent average breeding values; for genomic estimated breeding values, 30 to 40% of the variation was due to within-family differences. Finally, there was no difference between constraining inbreeding via pedigree or genomic relationships in the real data. Conclusions: The use of genomic estimated breeding values increased genetic gain in optimal contribution selection. Genomic estimated breeding values were more accurate and showed more within-family variation, which led to higher genetic gains for the same restriction on inbreeding. Using genomic relationships to restrict inbreeding provided no additional gain, except in the case of very large full-sib families.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Mendelian sampling terms as a selective advantage in optimum breeding schemes with restrictions on the rate of inbreeding [J].
Avendaño, S ;
Woolliams, JA ;
Villanueva, B .
GENETICS RESEARCH, 2004, 83 (01) :55-64
[2]   Fast and flexible simulation of DNA sequence data [J].
Chen, Gary K. ;
Marjoram, Paul ;
Wall, Jeffrey D. .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2009, 19 (01) :136-142
[3]   The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemes [J].
Clark, Samuel A. ;
Hickey, John M. ;
Daetwyler, Hans D. ;
van der Werf, Julius H. J. .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2012, 44 :4
[4]   Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation [J].
Clark, Samuel A. ;
Hickey, John M. ;
van der Werf, Julius H. J. .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2011, 43
[5]   Inbreeding in genome-wide selection [J].
Daetwyler, H. D. ;
Villanueva, B. ;
Bijma, P. ;
Woolliams, J. A. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2007, 124 (06) :369-376
[6]  
Falconer D.S., 1996, Quantitative Genetics, V4th
[7]   The nature, scope and impact of genomic prediction in beef cattle in the United States [J].
Garrick, Dorian J. .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2011, 43
[8]  
Gilmore A.R., 2009, Asreml User Guide Release 3.0
[9]   The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values [J].
Habier, D. ;
Fernando, R. L. ;
Dekkers, J. C. M. .
GENETICS, 2007, 177 (04) :2389-2397
[10]   The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle [J].
Habier, David ;
Tetens, Jens ;
Seefried, Franz-Reinhold ;
Lichtner, Peter ;
Thaller, Georg .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2010, 42