Personal response systems and learning performance: The mediating role of learners' engagement

被引：6
作者：
Chan, Simon C. H. [1 ]
Ko, Stephen [1 ]
机构：
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Management & Mkt, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong 852, Peoples R China
来源：
JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR BUSINESS | 2019年 / 94卷 / 04期
关键词：
Engagement; higher education; learning performance; personal response systems; STUDENTS PERCEPTIONS; ELECTRONIC RESPONSE; CLICKERS; CLASSROOM; TECHNOLOGY; BUSINESS; SATISFACTION; FEEDBACK; IMPACT;
D O I：
10.1080/08832323.2018.1520684
中图分类号：
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号：
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要：
The use of personal response systems (PRSs) to support the learning process is increasing. This study examines the impact of PRSs from individual learners' and instructors' perspectives on individual learners' engagement with PRSs and their learning performance. Data were collected from a sample of 236 undergraduate bachelor of business administration students in the School of Business at a Hong Kong university. The results indicated that the learner interface was important to individual learners' engagement with PRSs and their learning performance. Instructor attitude and technical competence had significant impacts on learning performance. Engagement with PRSs partially mediated the effect of both perspectives on learning performance. Implications for the theory and practice of individual learners' learning performance are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码：234 / 242
页数：9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[2]   Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance [J].
Blasco-Arcas, Lorena ;
Buil, Isabel ;
Hernandez-Ortega, Blanca ;
Javier Sese, F. .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2013, 62 :102-110
[3]  
Boyle J.T., 2003, ALT J, V11, P43, DOI [10.3402/rlt.v11i3.11284, DOI 10.3402/RLT.V11I3.11284]
[4]   Metacognition and the influence of polling systems: how do clickers compare with low technology systems [J].
Brady, Melanie ;
Seli, Helena ;
Rosenthal, Jane .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 61 (06) :885-902
[5]   Do we click in the right way? A meta-analytic review of clicker-integrated instruction [J].
Chien, Yu-Ta ;
Chang, Yueh-Hsia ;
Chang, Chun-Yen .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2016, 17 :1-18
[6]   ERP training with a web-based electronic learning system: The flow theory perspective [J].
Choi, Duke Hyun ;
Kim, Jeoungkun ;
Kim, Soung Hie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2007, 65 (03) :223-243
[7]   Business Students' Perceptions, Attitudes, and Satisfaction With Interactive Technology: An Exploratory Study [J].
Eastman, Jacqueline ;
Iyer, Rajesh ;
Eastman, Kevin .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR BUSINESS, 2011, 86 (01) :36-43
[8]   Interactive Learning in the Classroom: Is Student Response Method Related to Performance? [J].
Elicker, Joelle D. ;
McConnell, Nicole L. .
TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 38 (03) :147-150
[9]   Faculty Perceptions of the Adoption and Use of Clickers in the Legal Studies in Business Classroom [J].
Farag, Denise M. ;
Park, Susan ;
Kaupins, Gundars .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR BUSINESS, 2015, 90 (04) :208-216
[10]  
Gallini S., 2003, Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, V10, P5
1234