共 50 条
The biological approach in acetabular revision surgery: impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup
被引:10
作者:
Colo, Ena
[1
]
Rijnen, Wim H. C.
[1
]
Schreurs, Berend Willem
[1
]
机构:
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词:
Hip;
Arthroplasty;
Revision;
Bone graft;
Cemented;
TOTAL HIP-REPLACEMENT;
POROUS TITANIUM PARTICLES;
CONCISE FOLLOW-UP;
50 YEARS OLD;
RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS;
PATIENTS YOUNGER;
INITIAL STABILITY;
MORSELIZED ALLOGRAFTS;
IN-VITRO;
RECONSTRUCTION;
D O I:
10.5301/hipint.5000267
中图分类号:
R826.8 [整形外科学];
R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学];
R726.2 [小儿整形外科学];
R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Acetabular impaction bone grafting (IBG) in combination with a cemented cup in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a proven and well-recognised technique which has been used in clinical practice for more than 35 years. Nowadays, with cemented prostheses tending to lose a larger part of the THA market every year in primary and revision cases, and many young surgeons being only trained in implanting uncemented prostheses, this technique is considered by many as technically demanding and time consuming, making its use less appealing. Despite this image and many new innovative techniques using uncemented implants in acetabular revisions over the last 25 years, IBG with a cemented cup is still one of the few techniques that really can reconstitute bone and respects human biology. In this era of many biologically-based breakthroughs in medicine, it is hard to explain that the solution of most orthopaedic surgeons for the extensive bone defects as frequently seen during acetabular revision surgery, consists of implanting bigger and larger metal implants. This review aims to put the IBG method into a historical perspective, to describe the surgical technique and present the clinical results.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 367
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条