Coin Rotation Task (CRT): A New Test of Motor Dexterity

被引:37
作者
Mendoza, J. E. [1 ]
Apostolos, G. T. [2 ]
Humphreys, J. D. [3 ]
Hanna-Pladdy, B. [4 ]
O'Bryant, S. E. [5 ]
机构
[1] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Mental Hlth Serv Line, New Orleans, LA 70161 USA
[2] Winter Haven Hosp, Winter Haven, FL USA
[3] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Psychol, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[4] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Landon Ctr Aging, Kansas City, KS 66103 USA
[5] Texas Tech Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Neurol, Lubbock, TX 79430 USA
关键词
Manual dexterity; Motor tests; Bedside assessment; Validity;
D O I
10.1093/arclin/acp030
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Coin-rotation task (CRT), a measure of rapid, coordinated finger movements, was devised as a convenient, easily administered bedside test of motor dexterity; however, very little psychometric data exist regarding this task. The current project was undertaken to (a) provide preliminary normative data, (b) examine the convergent and discriminant validity of the task when compared with other standardized motor measures, and (c) examine the diagnostic accuracy of the CRT. The sample of 86 male participants included 60 controls and 26 patients with unilateral lesions of the left (n = 13) and right (n = 13) hemispheres. The CRT was not significantly correlated with age or education; non-adjusted left- and right-hand normative data are provided. The CRT demonstrated good convergent and divergent validity when compared with other standardized motor measures. The CRT was successful in differentiating control and brain damaged groups with mild motor impairment, and demonstrated an overall classification rate of 84.9%. Levels of sensitivity and specificity of the CRT were comparable with or better than other standardized tests of manual dexterity. The CRT offers a valid, quick, and convenient bedside measure of subtle motor impairment.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 292
页数:6
相关论文
共 4 条
[1]   HAND DYNAMOMETER AS A NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL MEASURE [J].
DODRILL, CB .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1978, 46 (06) :1432-1435
[2]  
Kessler H. R., 2006, CLIN NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, DOI [10.1037/11299-005, DOI 10.1037/11299-005]
[3]  
Mendoza J., 1995, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, V1, P355
[4]  
Spreen O., 1998, Administration, norms, and commentary, V2, P533