Molecular genetic testing strategies used in diagnostic flow for hereditary endocrine tumour syndromes

被引:6
作者
Butz, Henriett [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Blair, Jo [4 ]
Patocs, Attila [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Oncol, Dept Mol Genet, Budapest, Hungary
[2] Semmelweis Univ, Hereditary Canc Res Grp, Hungarian Acad Sci, Budapest, Hungary
[3] Semmelweis Univ, Dept Lab Med, Budapest, Hungary
[4] Alder Hey Childrens Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[5] Semmelweis Univ, Budapest, Hungary
关键词
Inherited tumour; Genetic testing; Endocrine tumour syndromes; Next-generation sequencing;
D O I
10.1007/s12020-021-02636-x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Although current guidelines prefer the use of targeted testing or small-scale gene panels for identification of genetic susceptibility of hereditary endocrine tumour syndromes, next generation sequencing based strategies have been widely introduced into every day clinical practice. The application of next generation sequencing allows rapid testing of multiple genes in a cost effective manner. Increasing knowledge about these techniques and the demand from health care providers and society, shift the molecular genetic testing towards using high-throughput approaches. Purpose In this expert opinion, the authors consider the molecular diagnostic workflow step by step, evaluating options and challenges of gathering family information, pre- and post-test genetic counselling, technical and bioinformatical analysis related issues and difficulties in clinical interpretation focusing on molecular genetic testing of hereditary endocrine tumour syndromes. Result and conclusion Considering all these factors, a diagnostic genetic workflow is also proposed for selection of the best approach for testing of patients with hereditary genetic tumour syndromes in order to minimalize difficult interpretation, unwanted patient anxiety, unnecessary medical interventions and cost. There are potential benefits of utilizing high throughput approaches however, important limitations have to be considered and should discussed towards the clinicians and patients.
引用
收藏
页码:641 / 652
页数:12
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [1] Adams-Campbell LL, 2007, BREAST J, V13, P332, DOI 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2007.00439.x
  • [2] Genetic testing in endocrine surgery: Opportunities for precision surgery
    Alobuia, Wilson
    Annes, Justin
    Kebebew, Electron
    [J]. SURGERY, 2020, 168 (02) : 328 - 334
  • [3] Adverse Events in Cancer Genetic Testing Medical, Ethical, Legal, and Financial Implications
    Brierley, Karina L.
    Blouch, Erica
    Cogswell, Whitney
    Homer, Jeanne P.
    Pencarinha, Debbie
    Stanislaw, Christine L.
    Matloff, Ellen T.
    [J]. CANCER JOURNAL, 2012, 18 (04) : 303 - 309
  • [4] Butz, 2010, MIKRORNS EK SZEREPE
  • [5] Butz Henriett, 2019, Exp Suppl, V111, P33, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-25905-1_4
  • [6] Next-generation sequencing in the clinical genetic screening of patients with pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma
    Crona, Joakim
    Verdugo, Alberto Delgado
    Granberg, Dan
    Welin, Staffan
    Stalberg, Peter
    Hellman, Per
    Bjorklund, Peyman
    [J]. ENDOCRINE CONNECTIONS, 2013, 2 (02) : 104 - 111
  • [7] Points to consider in the reevaluation and reanalysis of genomic test results: a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
    Deignan, Joshua L.
    Chung, Wendy K.
    Kearney, Hutton M.
    Monaghan, Kristin G.
    Rehder, Catherine W.
    Chao, Elizabeth C.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2019, 21 (06) : 1267 - 1270
  • [8] Di Resta Chiara, 2018, EJIFCC, V29, P4
  • [9] Genetic testing in inherited endocrine disorders: joint position paper of the European reference network on rare endocrine conditions (Endo-ERN)
    Eggermann, Thomas
    Elbracht, Miriam
    Kurth, Ingo
    Juul, Anders
    Johannsen, Trine Holm
    Netchine, Irene
    Mastorakos, George
    Johannsson, Gudmundur
    Musholt, Thomas J.
    Zenker, Martin
    Prawitt, Dirk
    Pereira, Alberto M.
    Hiort, Olaf
    [J]. ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [10] Ellard S, 2020, ACGS BEST PRACTICE G