Impact of CMS Coverage Decision on Access to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

被引:5
|
作者
O'Neill, Brian P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
O'Neill, William W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Williams, Donald [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cohen, Mauricio G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Heldman, Alan W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Macon, Conrad [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Martinez, Claudia A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Alfonso, Carlos E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Clark, Pedro Martinez [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Velasquez, Omaida [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Seo, David [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Clermont, Pascal Goldschmidt [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Moscucci, Mauro [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami Hosp, Miller Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Miami, FL USA
[2] Univ Miami Hosp, Miller Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Cardiothorac & Vasc Surg,Cardiovasc Div, Miami, FL USA
[3] Univ Miami Hosp, Miller Sch Med, Elaine & Sydney Sussman Cardiac Catheterizat Lab, Miami, FL USA
关键词
aortic stenosis; vascular approach; women; IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR; HIGH-RISK PATIENTS; TRANSAORTIC APPROACH; HEART-FAILURE; STENOSIS; OUTCOMES; PREVENTION; REGISTRY; THERAPY; AREA;
D O I
10.1002/ccd.25394
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess the impact of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) national coverage determination (NCD) on access for patients with aortic stenosis (AS) with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in a tertiary care center. Background: TAVR has given hope to patients with AS who are deemed inoperable. The effects of the NCD on access to patients with AS has not been evaluated. Materials and Methods: A total of 94 inoperable AS patients were evaluated and treated from December 2011 through June of 2012 with TAVR. Patients who underwent transfemoral (TF) vs. non-TF access were compared. The CMS NCD was released on May 1, 2012 and on July 1, 2012, the nontransfemoral access program was put on hold due to lack of reimbursement. Results: Patients in the TF (n = 33) and non-TF access (n = 61) groups were similar in age (85.2 +/- 6.3 vs. 84.8 +/- 6.6 P = 0.74) and STS mortality (9.38 +/- 5.33 vs. 7.91 +/- 3.69, P = 0.074). The iliofemoral arteries were larger diameter in the TF group (7.72 +/- 1.49 vs. 6.21 +/- 1.78, P < 0.001) and males (7.39 +/- 1.81 vs. 6.1 +/- 1.61 P < 0.001). More women underwent valve implantation via non-TF access (73 vs. 23%, P = 0.03). After the NCD, 21 patients who previously qualified for non-TF TAVR would not be reimbursed by CMS. Four died soon after. Conclusions: After the NCD, the proportion of inoperable patients with severe AS that can be treated with TAVR was greatly reduced due the lack of reimbursement for TAVR via non-TF access. This effect is particularly pronounced in women. (C) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 121
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Era
    Testa, Luca
    Rubbio, Antonio Popolo
    Casenghi, Matteo
    Pero, Gaetano
    Latib, Azeem
    Bedogni, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2019, 8 (22):
  • [32] Transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve
    Husso, Annastiina
    Airaksinen, Juhani
    Juvonen, Tatu
    Laine, Mika
    Dahlbacka, Sebastian
    Virtanen, Marko
    Niemela, Matti
    Makikallio, Timo
    Savontaus, Mikko
    Eskola, Markku
    Raivio, Peter
    Valtola, Antti
    Biancari, Fausto
    CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 110 (03) : 429 - 439
  • [33] Transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a novel transcatheter aortic valve replacement system in high-risk patients with severe aortic valve diseases
    Zhu, Liming
    Guo, Yingqiang
    Wang, Wei
    Liu, Huan
    Yang, Ye
    Wei, Lai
    Wang, Chunsheng
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 155 (02) : 588 - 597
  • [34] Review of alternative access in transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Banks, Adam
    Gaca, Jeff
    Kiefer, Todd
    CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2020, 10 (01) : 72 - 82
  • [35] Carotid Artery Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Guyton, Robert A.
    Block, Peter C.
    Thourani, Vinod H.
    Lerakis, Stamatios
    Babaliaros, Vasilis
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2013, 82 (04) : E583 - E586
  • [36] Economic Considerations in Access to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Reddy, Kriyana P. P.
    Groeneveld, Peter W. W.
    Giri, Jay
    Fanaroff, Alexander C. C.
    Nathan, Ashwin S. S.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2022, 15 (02) : E011489
  • [37] A Review of Alternative Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Young M.N.
    Singh V.
    Sakhuja R.
    Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2018, 20 (7)
  • [38] The Midterm Impact of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Michigan
    Patel, Himanshu J.
    Herbert, Morley A.
    Paone, Gaetano
    Heiser, John C.
    Shannon, Francis L.
    Theurer, Patricia F.
    Bell, Gail F.
    Prager, Richard L.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 102 (03) : 728 - 734
  • [39] Comparing Trajectory of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in the Early vs. Late Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Era
    Elbaz-Greener, Gabby
    Rozen, Guy
    Kusniec, Fabio
    Marai, Ibrahim
    Carasso, Shemy
    Ko, Dennis T.
    Wijeysundera, Harindra C.
    Alcalai, Ronny
    Planer, David
    Amir, Offer
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [40] Management of Vascular Access in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Toggweiler, Stefan
    Leipsic, Jonathon
    Binder, Ronald K.
    Freeman, Melanie
    Barbanti, Marco
    Heijmen, Robin H.
    Wood, David A.
    Webb, John G.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2013, 6 (07) : 643 - 653