Who Wants To Revise Privatization? The Complementarity of Market Skills and Institutions

被引:44
作者
Denisova, Irina [1 ]
Eller, Markus [2 ]
Frye, Timothy [3 ]
Zhuravskaya, Ekaterina
机构
[1] Ctr Econ & Financial Res, New Econ Sch, Moscow 117418, Russia
[2] Oesterreich Nationalbank, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Polit Sci, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
LATIN-AMERICA; TRANSITION; ATTITUDES; DEMOCRACY; SUPPORT; REFORM; WINNERS; CONTEXT; RUSSIA; LOSERS;
D O I
10.1017/S0003055409090248
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Using survey data from 28 transition countries, we test for the complementarity and substitutability of market-relevant skills and institutions. We show that democracy and good governance complement market skills in transition economies. Under autocracy and weak governance institutions, there is no significant difference in support for revising privatization between high- and low-skilled respondents. As the level of democracy and the quality of governance increases, the difference in the level of support for revising privatization between the high and low skilled grows dramatically. This finding contributes to our understanding of microfoundations of the politics of economic reform.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 304
页数:21
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Acemoglu D., 2006, Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511510809
[2]   DISTRIBUTIVE POLITICS AND ECONOMIC-GROWTH [J].
ALESINA, A ;
RODRIK, D .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1994, 109 (02) :465-490
[3]  
Anderson CJ, 2003, AM J POLIT SCI, V47, P91, DOI 10.1111/1540-5907.00007
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, GOVERNANCE MATTERS G
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, LIF TRANS SURV PEOPL
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata, DOI DOI 10.1093/GERONI/IGZ038.1816
[7]  
Appel Hilary., 2004, NEW CAPITALIST ORDER
[8]   Why is trade reform so popular in Latin America? A consumption-based theory of trade policy preferences [J].
Baker, A .
WORLD POLITICS, 2003, 55 (03) :423-+
[9]  
BECK N, 2005, POLIT ANAL, V13, P365
[10]  
Boix C., 2005, PRIVATIZATION PUBLIC