The Foregrounding Assessment Matrix: An interface for qualitative-quantitative interdisciplinary research

被引:4
作者
Gambino, Renata [1 ]
Pulvirenti, Grazia [1 ]
Sylvester, Teresa [2 ]
Jacobs, Arthur M. [2 ]
Luedtke, Jana [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Catania, Catania, Italy
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Berlin, Germany
来源
ENTHYMEMA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LITERARY CRITICISM LITERARY THEORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF LITERATURE | 2020年 / 26期
关键词
Qualitative and quantitative research; Literary criticism; Experimental psychology; Foregrounding; Density fields; LITERARY; METAPHORS; ANSWERS;
D O I
10.13130/2037-2426/14387
中图分类号
I0 [文学理论];
学科分类号
0501 ; 050101 ;
摘要
This paper presents the results of a transdisciplinary research conducted by scholars working in the humanities and experimental psychologists in order to find an interface between the needs of a qualitative approach (mainly based on the evaluation of stylistic features) and those of a quantitative analysis, in order to find useful features for testing different reading behaviors and for new hermeneutical enquiries. The results of our research, which was conducted in two Labs (Dahlem Institute for Neuroimaging of Emotion at the FU Berlin and the NewHums - Neurocog-nitive and Human Studies at the University of Catania), consistently differ from previous ones, as they focus on the whole multi-layered foregrounded texture of a poem and try to evaluate predictable differences in reading, re-reading behaviour and meaning-making processes. We present the FAM, targeting foregrounding elements in three main categories: the phonological, morpho-syntactic, and rhetoric. To identify those elements, four different text levels were taken into account, the sublexical level of phonemes and syllables, the lexical level of single words, the interlexical level of word combinations across longer distance (e.g. two lines), and the supralexical level of whole stanzas or an entire poem. In contrast to previous quantitative analyses on short, isolated sentences and texts, mostly expository in nature (`textoids'), or on single words or segments, the text is considered as a whole, marked by density fields that work as milestones along a reading route.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 284
页数:24
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1975, ROMANTIC PROGRESSION
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Scientific Study of Literature
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Linguist. Lit. Stud, DOI DOI 10.13189/LLS.2016.040110
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Scientific Study of Literature, DOI DOI 10.1075/SSOL.5.2.01JAC
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, STORIE MENTI MONDI A
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Scientific Study of Literature, DOI [DOI 10.3758/S13415-015-0396-X, DOI 10.1075/SSOL.6.1.06JAC]
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Gehirn und Gedicht. Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren
[8]  
Baldick Chris., 2008, OXFORD DICT LIT TERM
[9]  
Bleich David., 1975, READINGS FEELINGS
[10]  
Bortolussi Marisa, 2015, OXFORD HDB ONLINE