Survival and Cost-Effectiveness of Sorafenib Therapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Analysis of the SEER-Medicare Database

被引:76
|
作者
Parikh, Neehar D. [1 ]
Marshall, Vincent D. [2 ]
Singal, Amit G. [3 ]
Nathan, Hari [4 ]
Lok, Anna S. [1 ]
Balkrishnan, Rajesh [5 ]
Shahinian, Vahakn [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Div Gastroenterol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Coll Pharm, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Div Digest & Liver Dis, Dallas, TX USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Surg, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[5] Univ Virginia, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Charlottesville, VA USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Kidney Epidemiol & Cost Ctr, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
RECOMMENDATIONS; EFFICACY; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1002/hep.28881
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Sorafenib is the only chemotherapeutic approved for treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its effectiveness in patients with Child-Pugh class B cirrhosis and any moderating effects of health system characteristics are unclear. We examined the survival and cost-effectiveness associated with sorafenib in elderly patients with advanced HCC. We performed an analysis of Medicare beneficiaries with HCC diagnoses from 2007 to 2009. We compared advanced stage patients with HCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III/IV) who received sorafenib within 6 months of diagnosis (and were otherwise untreated) to advanced stage patients with HCC who received no therapy (control). We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to identify predictors of survival. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for sorafenib-treated and control patients. We included 228 sorafenib-treated patients and 870 control patients. The median survival of the sorafenib-treated patients was 150.5 days versus 62 days for control patients. On multivariate analysis, significant predictors of improved survival were treatment with sorafenib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.77), being seen at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.97), and being seen at a transplantation center (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.65-0.93). Predictors of worse survival included stage IV disease (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.24-1.58), decompensated cirrhosis (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.301.70), and treatment in an urban setting (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.21-1.73.) Although sorafenib use was associated with a survival benefit (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.79) among patients with decompensated cirrhosis, the median survival benefit was 31 days, and it was not cost-effective (ICER, $ 224,914 per life year gained). Conclusion: Sorafenib is associated with improved survival in elderly patients with advanced HCC; however, it is not cost-effective among those with hepatic decompensation.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 133
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis of nimotuzumab for the radiotherapy of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Fei, Zhaodong
    Xu, Ting
    Li, Mengying
    Chen, Taojun
    Li, Li
    Qiu, Xiufang
    Chen, Chuanben
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [12] Cost-effectiveness analysis of transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib as the first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
    He, Ying
    Lin, Wangchun
    Cai, Zhongjie
    Huang, Yufan
    You, Maojin
    Lei, Meisheng
    Chen, Ruijia
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [13] Sustained complete remission of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with sorafenib therapy
    Azmi, Ahmad Najib
    Chan, Wah-Kheong
    Goh, Khean-Lee
    JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 2015, 16 (09) : 537 - 540
  • [14] Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Su, Dan
    Wu, Bin
    Shi, Lizheng
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (02)
  • [15] Cost-effectiveness analysis of cemiplimab vs pembrolizumab for treatment of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
    Paul, Eleanor
    Konidaris, Gerasimos
    Cope, Shannon
    Chen, Chieh-, I
    Keeping, Sam
    Xu, Yingxin
    Atsou, Kokuvi
    Ayers, Dieter
    Guyot, Patricia
    Sasane, Medha
    Mojebi, Ali
    Kuznik, Andreas
    JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2021, 27 (11) : 1513 - 1525
  • [16] The effect of anticonvulsants on survival among patients with GBM brain tumors undergoing radiation: A SEER-Medicare analysis
    Patel, Mausam A.
    Bimali, Milan
    Li, Chenghui
    Kesaria, Anam
    Xia, Fen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 106 : 32 - 36
  • [17] Cost Effectiveness of Regorafenib as Second-Line Therapy for Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Parikh, Neehar D.
    Singal, Amit G.
    Hutton, David W.
    CANCER, 2017, 123 (19) : 3725 - 3731
  • [18] Impact of surgical treatment after sorafenib therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
    Takeyama, Hideaki
    Beppu, Toru
    Higashi, Takaaki
    Kaida, Takayoshi
    Arima, Kota
    Taki, Katsunobu
    Imai, Katsunori
    Nitta, Hidetoshi
    Hayashi, Hiromitsu
    Nakagawa, Shigeki
    Okabe, Hirohisa
    Hashimoto, Daisuke
    Chikamoto, Akira
    Ishiko, Takatoshi
    Tanaka, Motohiko
    Sasaki, Yutaka
    Baba, Hideo
    SURGERY TODAY, 2018, 48 (04) : 431 - 438
  • [19] Cost-effectiveness of EOB-MRI for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Japan
    Nishie, Akihiro
    Goshima, Satoshi
    Haradome, Hiroki
    Hatano, Etsuro
    Imai, Yasuharu
    Kudo, Masatoshi
    Matsuda, Masanori
    Motosugi, Utaroh
    Saitoh, Satoshi
    Yoshimitsu, Kengo
    Crawford, Bruce
    Kruger, Eliza
    Ball, Graeme
    Honda, Hiroshi
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 39 (04) : 738 - 750
  • [20] Cost-effectiveness Analysis of a Two-stage Screening Intervention for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Taiwan
    Shih, Sophy Ting-Fang
    Crowley, Steve
    Sheu, Jin-Chuan
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 109 (01) : 39 - 55