Survival and Cost-Effectiveness of Sorafenib Therapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Analysis of the SEER-Medicare Database

被引:76
|
作者
Parikh, Neehar D. [1 ]
Marshall, Vincent D. [2 ]
Singal, Amit G. [3 ]
Nathan, Hari [4 ]
Lok, Anna S. [1 ]
Balkrishnan, Rajesh [5 ]
Shahinian, Vahakn [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Div Gastroenterol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Coll Pharm, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Div Digest & Liver Dis, Dallas, TX USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Surg, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[5] Univ Virginia, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Charlottesville, VA USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Kidney Epidemiol & Cost Ctr, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
RECOMMENDATIONS; EFFICACY; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1002/hep.28881
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Sorafenib is the only chemotherapeutic approved for treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its effectiveness in patients with Child-Pugh class B cirrhosis and any moderating effects of health system characteristics are unclear. We examined the survival and cost-effectiveness associated with sorafenib in elderly patients with advanced HCC. We performed an analysis of Medicare beneficiaries with HCC diagnoses from 2007 to 2009. We compared advanced stage patients with HCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III/IV) who received sorafenib within 6 months of diagnosis (and were otherwise untreated) to advanced stage patients with HCC who received no therapy (control). We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to identify predictors of survival. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for sorafenib-treated and control patients. We included 228 sorafenib-treated patients and 870 control patients. The median survival of the sorafenib-treated patients was 150.5 days versus 62 days for control patients. On multivariate analysis, significant predictors of improved survival were treatment with sorafenib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.77), being seen at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.97), and being seen at a transplantation center (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.65-0.93). Predictors of worse survival included stage IV disease (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.24-1.58), decompensated cirrhosis (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.301.70), and treatment in an urban setting (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.21-1.73.) Although sorafenib use was associated with a survival benefit (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.79) among patients with decompensated cirrhosis, the median survival benefit was 31 days, and it was not cost-effective (ICER, $ 224,914 per life year gained). Conclusion: Sorafenib is associated with improved survival in elderly patients with advanced HCC; however, it is not cost-effective among those with hepatic decompensation.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 133
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sorafenib versus Transarterial chemoembolization for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Chen, Shuling
    Peng, Zhenwei
    Wei, Mengchao
    Liu, Weifeng
    Dai, Zihao
    Wang, Haibo
    Mei, Jie
    Cheong, Mingfong
    Zhang, Hanmei
    Kuang, Ming
    BMC CANCER, 2018, 18
  • [2] Effectiveness and cost of radiofrequency ablation and stereotactic body radiotherapy for treatment of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: An analysis of SEER-medicare
    Parikh, Neehar D.
    Marshall, Vincent D.
    Green, Michael
    Lawrence, Theodore S.
    Razumilava, Nataliya
    Owen, Dawn
    Singal, Amit G.
    Feng, Mary
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 62 (05) : 673 - 681
  • [3] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Selective Internal Radiotherapy With Yttrium-90 Versus Sorafenib in Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Marqueen, Kathryn E.
    Kim, Edward
    Ang, Celina
    Mazumdar, Madhu
    Buckstein, Michael
    Ferket, Bart S.
    JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2021, 17 (02) : E266 - E277
  • [4] Survival and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Competing Strategies in the Management of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Naugler, Willscott E.
    Sonnenberg, Amnon
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 16 (10) : 1186 - 1194
  • [5] Penile Implant Utilization Following Treatment for Prostate Cancer: Analysis of the SEER-Medicare Database
    Tal, Raanan
    Jacks, Lindsay M.
    Elkin, Elena
    Mulhall, John P.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2011, 8 (06) : 1797 - 1804
  • [6] Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib for Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Zhang, Xin
    Wang, Jingjing
    Shi, Juanjuan
    Jia, Xiaoli
    Dang, Shuangsuo
    Wang, Wenjun
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (04)
  • [7] Cost-effectiveness analysis of durvalumab plus tremelimumab as first-line therapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
    Liao, Weiting
    Xu, Huiqiong
    Hutton, David
    Wu, Qiuji
    Yang, Yang
    Feng, Mingyang
    Lei, Wanting
    Bai, Liangliang
    Li, Junying
    Li, Qiu
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 16
  • [8] Impact of combined selective internal radiation therapy and sorafenib on survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
    Ricke, Jens
    Klumpen, Heinz Josef
    Amthauer, Holger
    Bargellini, Irene
    Bartenstein, Peter
    de Toni, Enrico N.
    Gasbarrini, Antonio
    Pech, Maciej
    Peck-Radosavljevic, Markus
    Popovic, Peter
    Rosmorduc, Olivier
    Schott, Eckart
    Seidensticker, Max
    Verslype, Chris
    Sangro, Bruno
    Malfertheiner, Peter
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 71 (06) : 1164 - 1174
  • [9] A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment
    Yuen, Sydney C.
    Amaefule, Adaeze Q.
    Kim, Hannah H.
    Owoo, Breanna-Verissa
    Gorman, Emily F.
    Mattingly, T. Joseph I. I. I. I.
    PHARMACOECONOMICS-OPEN, 2022, 6 (01) : 9 - 19
  • [10] Cost-effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review
    Gong, Hongyu
    Ong, Siew Chin
    Li, Fan
    Shen, Yan
    Weng, Zhiying
    Zhao, Keying
    Jiang, Zhengyou
    Wang, Meng
    HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2024, 14 (01):