A novel screening strategy for clinically significant prostate cancer in elderly men over 75 years of age

被引:4
|
作者
Iwamoto, Hiroaki [1 ]
Izumi, Kouji [1 ]
Kadomoto, Suguru [1 ]
Makino, Tomoyuki [1 ]
Naito, Renato [1 ]
Yaegashi, Hiroshi [1 ]
Shigehara, Kazuyoshi [1 ]
Kadono, Yoshifumi [1 ]
Mizokami, Atsushi [1 ]
机构
[1] Kanazawa Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Integrat Canc Therapy & Urol, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 9208640, Japan
关键词
biopsy; elderly; Gleason score; percent free prostate-specific antigen; prostate cancer; prostate-specific antigen; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; OLDER PATIENTS; CHINESE MEN; ANTIGEN; POPULATION; GUIDELINES; DIAGNOSIS; BIOPSY; RISK;
D O I
10.4103/aja.aja_39_20
中图分类号
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
摘要
A standard modality for prostate cancer detection in men 75 years and older has not been established. A simple screening method for elderly patients is needed to avoid unnecessary biopsies and to effectively diagnose prostate cancer. A retrospective study was conducted on elderly patients who had prostate biopsy at Kanazawa University Hospital (Kanazawa, Japan) between 2000 and 2017. Of the 2251 patients who underwent prostate biopsy, 254 had clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPC) with a Gleason score (GS) of >= 7 and 273 had a GS of <7 or no malignancy. In this study, patients aged 75 years or older were classified as elderly patients. GS >= 7 was characterized by a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of the maximum area under the curve of 12 ng ml-1 with a sensitivity of 76.2% and a specificity of 73.2%. For PSA levels between 4 ng ml-1 and 12 ng ml-1, based on the maximum area under the curve, patients with three or four of the following factors may present a GS of >= 7: percent free PSA >24, PSA density >= 0.24 ng ml-2, positive findings on digital rectal examination, and transrectal with 90.0% sensitivity and 67.4% specificity. In this study, we found that raising the PSA cutoff to 12 ng ml-1 for CSPC in elderly individuals can significantly reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies. Furthermore, CSPC could be efficiently discovered by combining the four supplementary markers in patients with a PSA level of 4-12 ng ml-1. By performing this screening for elderly men over 75 years of age, unnecessary biopsies may be reduced and CSPC may be detected efficiently.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / +
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison between the European Randomized Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG) risk calculators: Prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer risk in a cohort of patients from Argentina
    Villota, P. M. Orbe
    Centeno, J. A. Leiva
    Lugones, J.
    Minuzzi, P. G.
    Varea, S. M.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2024, 48 (03): : 210 - 217
  • [32] Nomograms for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer in men with PI-RADS-3 biparametric magnetic resonance imaging
    Liang, Zhen
    Feng, Tianrui
    Zhou, Yi
    Yang, Yongjiao
    Sun, Yujiao
    Zhou, Zhien
    Yan, Weigang
    Cao, Fenghong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [33] Pathological and Oncological Outcomes of Elderly Men with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
    Mitsuzuka, Koji
    Koie, Takuya
    Narita, Shintaro
    Kaiho, Yasuhiro
    Yoneyama, Takahiro
    Tsuchiya, Norihiko
    Kakoi, Narihiko
    Kawamura, Sadafumi
    Tochigi, Tatsuo
    Ohyama, Chikara
    Habuchi, Tomonori
    Arai, Yoichi
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 43 (12) : 1238 - 1242
  • [34] Psychological Predictors of Prostate Cancer Screening Behaviors Among Men Over 50 Years of Age in Hamadan: Perceived Threat and Efficacy
    Barati, Majid
    Amirzargar, Mohammad Ali
    Bashirian, Saeed
    Kafami, Vahid
    Mousali, Amir Abbas
    Moeini, Babak
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2016, 9 (04)
  • [35] Diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging combined with clinical parameters in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: A novel diagnostic model
    Ippolito, Davide
    Querques, Giulia
    Pecorelli, Anna
    Perugini, Giovanna
    Roscigno, Marco
    Da Pozzo, Luigi Filippo
    Maino, Cesare
    Sironi, Sandro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 (10) : 866 - 873
  • [36] Approach to prostate cancer in men older than 75 years. Active or passive?
    Spahn, M.
    Haeni, K.
    UROLOGE, 2012, 51 (10): : 1368 - +
  • [37] Prostate cancer screening among elderly men in Brazil: should we diagnose or not?
    Mori, Rafael Ribeiro
    Faria, Eliney Ferreira
    Mauad, Edmundo Carvalho
    Rodrigues, Antonio Antunes, Jr.
    Dos Reis, Rodolfo Borges
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2020, 46 (01): : 34 - 41
  • [38] Screening for Breast Cancer in Women Age 75 Years and Older
    Lee, Cindy S.
    Moy, Linda
    Joe, Bonnie N.
    Sickles, Edward A.
    Niell, Bethany L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (02) : 256 - 263
  • [39] Brachytherapy in men aged ≤54 years with clinically localized prostate cancer
    Merrick, Gregory S.
    Wallner, Kent E.
    Butler, Wayne M.
    Galbreatho, Robert W.
    Allen, Zachariah A.
    Adamovich, Edward
    True, Lawrence
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 98 (02) : 324 - 328
  • [40] MultiParametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeat Prostate Biopsy
    Huang, Cong
    Song, Gang
    Wang, He
    Ji, Guangjie
    Li, Jie
    Chen, Yuke
    Fan, Yu
    Fang, Dong
    Xiong, Gengyan
    Xin, Zhongcheng
    Zhou, Liqun
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 2018