A novel screening strategy for clinically significant prostate cancer in elderly men over 75 years of age

被引:4
|
作者
Iwamoto, Hiroaki [1 ]
Izumi, Kouji [1 ]
Kadomoto, Suguru [1 ]
Makino, Tomoyuki [1 ]
Naito, Renato [1 ]
Yaegashi, Hiroshi [1 ]
Shigehara, Kazuyoshi [1 ]
Kadono, Yoshifumi [1 ]
Mizokami, Atsushi [1 ]
机构
[1] Kanazawa Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Integrat Canc Therapy & Urol, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 9208640, Japan
关键词
biopsy; elderly; Gleason score; percent free prostate-specific antigen; prostate cancer; prostate-specific antigen; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; OLDER PATIENTS; CHINESE MEN; ANTIGEN; POPULATION; GUIDELINES; DIAGNOSIS; BIOPSY; RISK;
D O I
10.4103/aja.aja_39_20
中图分类号
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
摘要
A standard modality for prostate cancer detection in men 75 years and older has not been established. A simple screening method for elderly patients is needed to avoid unnecessary biopsies and to effectively diagnose prostate cancer. A retrospective study was conducted on elderly patients who had prostate biopsy at Kanazawa University Hospital (Kanazawa, Japan) between 2000 and 2017. Of the 2251 patients who underwent prostate biopsy, 254 had clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPC) with a Gleason score (GS) of >= 7 and 273 had a GS of <7 or no malignancy. In this study, patients aged 75 years or older were classified as elderly patients. GS >= 7 was characterized by a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of the maximum area under the curve of 12 ng ml-1 with a sensitivity of 76.2% and a specificity of 73.2%. For PSA levels between 4 ng ml-1 and 12 ng ml-1, based on the maximum area under the curve, patients with three or four of the following factors may present a GS of >= 7: percent free PSA >24, PSA density >= 0.24 ng ml-2, positive findings on digital rectal examination, and transrectal with 90.0% sensitivity and 67.4% specificity. In this study, we found that raising the PSA cutoff to 12 ng ml-1 for CSPC in elderly individuals can significantly reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies. Furthermore, CSPC could be efficiently discovered by combining the four supplementary markers in patients with a PSA level of 4-12 ng ml-1. By performing this screening for elderly men over 75 years of age, unnecessary biopsies may be reduced and CSPC may be detected efficiently.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / +
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pneumonectomy for lung cancer over the age of 75 years: is it worthwhile?
    Zuin, Andrea
    Marulli, Giuseppe
    Breda, Cristiano
    Bulf, Renato
    Schiavon, Marco
    Rebusso, Alessandro
    Di Chiara, Francesco
    Rea, Federico
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2010, 10 (06) : 931 - 935
  • [22] Diagnosis status and pathological diagnosis derived treatment of elderly lung cancer patients over 75 years old
    Wu, Guannan
    Gu, Xiaoling
    Yuan, Dongmei
    Yao, Yanwen
    Yang, Wen
    Lv, Tangfeng
    Song, Yong
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 8 (01) : 87 - 95
  • [23] Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Improves the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer among Men on Active Surveillance
    Abouassaly, Robert
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 205 (04): : 1074 - 1074
  • [24] Postoperative upgrading of prostate cancer in men ≥75 years: a propensity score-matched analysis
    Annika Herlemann
    Alexander Buchner
    Alexander Kretschmer
    Maria Apfelbeck
    Christian G. Stief
    Christian Gratzke
    Stefan Tritschler
    World Journal of Urology, 2017, 35 : 1517 - 1524
  • [25] Men under the age of 55 years with screen detected prostate cancer do not have less significant disease compared to older men in a population of patients in Australia
    Nandu D. Dantanarayana
    Tania Hossack
    Paul Cozzi
    Andrew Brooks
    Howard Lau
    Warick Delprado
    Manish I. Patel
    BMC Urology, 15
  • [26] The Mount Sinai Prebiopsy Risk Calculator for Predicting any Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Development of a Risk Predictive Tool and Validation with Advanced Neural Networking, Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outcome Database, and European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator
    Parekh, Sneha
    Ratnani, Parita
    Falagario, Ugo
    Lundon, Dara
    Kewlani, Deepshikha
    Nasri, Jordan
    Dovey, Zach
    Stroumbakis, Dimitrios
    Ranti, Daniel
    Grauer, Ralph
    Sobotka, Stanislaw
    Pedraza, Adriana
    Wagaskar, Vinayak
    Mistry, Lajja
    Jambor, Ivan
    Lantz, Anna
    Ettala, Otto
    Stabile, Armando
    Taimen, Pekka
    Aronen, Hannu J.
    Knaapila, Juha
    Perez, Ileana Montoya
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Martini, Alberto
    Picker, Wolfgang
    Haug, Erik
    Cormio, Luigi
    Nordstrom, Tobias
    Briganti, Alberto
    Bostrom, Peter J.
    Carrieri, Giuseppe
    Haines, Kenneth
    Gorin, Michael A.
    Wiklund, Peter
    Menon, Mani
    Tewari, Ash
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 41 : 45 - 54
  • [27] Impact of PSA and DRE on Histologic Findings at Prostate Biopsy in Turkish Men Over 75 Years of Age
    Verim, Levent
    Yildirim, Asif
    Basok, Erem Kaan
    Peltekoglu, Erol
    Pelit, Eyup Sabri
    Zemheri, Ebru
    Tokuc, Resit
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2013, 14 (10) : 6085 - 6088
  • [28] Radiologists' Contribution to Variation in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men With Prostate MRI
    Naik, Sachin
    Burk, Kristine S.
    Budiawan, Elvira
    Lacson, Ronilda
    Lee, Leslie K.
    Fennessy, Fiona M.
    Tempany, Clare
    Cole, Alexander P.
    Trinh, Quoc-Dien
    Kibel, Adam S.
    Khorasani, Ramin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 19 (12) : 1312 - 1321
  • [29] Effectiveness of Bi-Parametric MR/US Fusion Biopsy for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Prostate Biopsy Naive Men
    Kim, Young Joo
    Huh, Jung Sik
    Park, Kyung Kgi
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 60 (04) : 346 - 351
  • [30] Development and validation of a predictive model for determining clinically significant prostate cancer in men with negative magnetic resonance imaging after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy
    Liu, Gang
    Zhu, Yuze
    Yao, Zichuan
    Jiang, Yunzhong
    Wu, Bin
    Bai, Song
    PROSTATE, 2021, 81 (13): : 983 - 991