Event Runoff and Sediment-Yield Neural Network Models for Assessment and Design of Management Practices for Small Agricultural Watersheds

被引:5
作者
Singh, Harsh Vardhan [1 ,2 ]
Thompson, Anita M. [2 ]
Gharabaghi, Bahram [3 ]
机构
[1] Trop Res & Educ Ctr, 18905 SW 280th St, Homestead, FL 33031 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Biol Syst Engn, 460 Henry Mall, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Univ Guelph, Sch Engn, Thornborough Bldg, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Agricultural watershed; Runoff; Sediment yield; Best management practice; Artificial neural networks; SOIL-EROSION; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; PREDICTING RUNOFF; DIFFUSE POLLUTION; SURFACE-WATER; LAND-USE; QUALITY; RIVER; CONSERVATION; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001457
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study presents the development of novel artificial neural networks (ANN) models for assessment of best management practices (BMPs) for controlling runoff and sediment yield from small agricultural watersheds. The ANN models integrate complex nonlinear effects of key climatic, topographic, drainage, and management characteristics and can evaluate BMP effectiveness without presumptions about their physical mechanisms or performance. Thirty-two ANN models were developed and tested. Penalty-related criteria and statistical model performance evaluation parameters were used to select the two models (one for runoff, one for sediment yield) with an optimum number of input parameters and hidden nodes. Event based monitoring data (n=248) at the outlet of seven watersheds (1.4-30.2ha) in southwestern Wisconsin were used to train, validate, and test the models. Statistical parameters (e.g.,R2=0.76-0.93) suggested that the ANN models performed well. Sensitivity analysis for the BMP parameters showed that the runoff model was heavily influenced by length of grassed waterway and channel density; the sediment-yield model was mainly affected by upland crop type and tillage.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 96 条
  • [1] Simulation of runoff and sediment yield using artificial neural networks
    Agarwal, Avinash
    Mishra, S. K.
    Ram, Sobha
    Singh, J. K.
    [J]. BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2006, 94 (04) : 597 - 613
  • [2] Angus J.E., 1991, Criteria for choosing the best neural netowrk
  • [3] [Anonymous], NEUR TOOLS 6 COMP SO
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1972, National Engineering Handbook Section 4 Hydrology
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2011, Journal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications
  • [6] Arabi M., 2004, Impact of best management practices on water quality of two small watersheds in Indiana: Role of spatial scale
  • [7] Representation of agricultural conservation practices with SWAT
    Arabi, Mazdak
    Frankenberger, Jane R.
    Enge, Bernie A.
    Arnold, Jeff G.
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2008, 22 (16) : 3042 - 3055
  • [8] Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment - Part 1: Model development
    Arnold, JG
    Srinivasan, R
    Muttiah, RS
    Williams, JR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 1998, 34 (01): : 73 - 89
  • [9] Forecasting watermain failure using artificial neural network modelling
    Asnaashari, Ahmad
    McBean, Edward A.
    Gharabaghi, Bahram
    Tutt, Donald
    [J]. CANADIAN WATER RESOURCES JOURNAL, 2013, 38 (01) : 24 - 33
  • [10] Integrative neural networks model for prediction of sediment rating curve parameters for ungauged basins
    Atieh, M.
    Mehltretter, S. L.
    Gharabaghi, B.
    Rudra, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2015, 531 : 1095 - 1107