Post-Subsidy Solar PV Business Models to Tackle Fuel Poverty in Multi-Occupancy Social Housing

被引:11
作者
Pitt, Joe [1 ]
Nolden, Colin [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Sustainable Energy, Household Energy Serv, Bristol BS1 3LH, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Law Sch, 8-10 Berkeley Sq, Bristol BS8 1HH, Avon, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Ctr Res Energy Demand Solut CREDS, Environm Change Inst ECI, 3 South Pk Rd, Oxford OX1 3QY, England
关键词
social housing; solar PV; feed-in tariff; community energy; multi-occupancy buildings; fuel poverty; energy justice; RENEWABLE ENERGY; MICRO-GENERATION; COMMUNITY ENERGY; PHOTOVOLTAICS; GOVERNANCE; ENGLAND; SYSTEMS; PEOPLE; EQUITY; ISSUES;
D O I
10.3390/en13184852
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
UK Feed-in Tariffs created a vibrant business ecosystem for the deployment of decentralised renewable energy technologies while constituting a regressive tax and increasing inequality. Business model innovation spurred by their withdrawal is providing valuable lessons for progressive policy design. Using the case study of solar PV deployment on multi-occupancy social housing, this paper reveals policy, business and organisational challenges that need to be overcome to address fuel poverty and reduce inequality. Suitable 'export' and 'local' business models were identified through a workshop and subsequently evaluated through qualitative thematic interview analysis. The 'local' model compares favourably in terms of production costs and benefits for fuel poor tenants but unfavourably in terms of transaction costs. Both models are considered equally susceptible to changes in policy. Their success hinges upon third party intermediaries, peer-to-peer learning and a supportive policy environment. This paper concludes with a policy recommendation to ensure that energy justice lies at the heart of the UK's transition to net-zero carbon through the fair distribution of costs and benefits by including specific provisions to protect low-income groups.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 70 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, FIX FUEL POV CHALL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, FUNDING LOW CARBON E
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, 10 10 CLIMATE ACTION
[5]   Urban energy generation: The added value of photovoltaics in social housing [J].
Bahaj, A. S. ;
James, P. A. B. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2007, 11 (09) :2121-2136
[6]   On Using Graph Signal Processing for Electrical Load Disaggregation [J].
Batreddy, Subbareddy ;
Kumar, Kriti ;
Chandra, M. Girish .
2019 26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING, DATA AND ANALYTICS WORKSHOP (HIPCW 2019), 2019, :2-7
[7]  
Braun V., 2006, Qual. Res. Psychol., V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, DOI 10.1080/10875549.2021.1929659, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
[8]  
Braunholtz-Speight T., 2018, The evolution of community energy in the UK
[9]   Framing and Mapping the Governance Barriers to Energy Upgrades in Flats [J].
Bright, Susan ;
Weatherall, David .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, 2017, 29 (02) :203-229
[10]   Prosumers in the post subsidy era: an exploration of new prosumer business models in the UK [J].
Brown, Donal ;
Hall, Stephen ;
Davis, Mark E. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 135