Searching for the Impact of Participation in Health and Health Research: Challenges and Methods

被引:32
作者
Harris, Janet [1 ]
Cook, Tina [2 ]
Gibbs, Lisa [3 ]
Oetzel, John [4 ]
Salsberg, Jon [5 ]
Shinn, Carolynne [6 ]
Springett, Jane [7 ]
Wallerstein, Nina [8 ]
Wright, Michael [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield S1 4DA, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Liverpool Hope Univ, Dept Disabil & Educ, Hope Pk, Liverpool L16 9JD, Merseyside, England
[3] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Hlth Equ, Level 5,207 Bouverie St, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
[4] Univ Waikato, Waikato Management Sch, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
[5] Univ Limerick, Grad Entry Med Sch, Limerick V94 T9PX, Ireland
[6] New Hampshire Div Hlth & Human Serv, 105 Pleast St, Concord, NH 03301 USA
[7] Univ Alberta, Sch Publ Hlth, 3-289 Edmonton Clin Hlth Acad,11405-87 Ave, Edmonton, AB T6G 2C9, Canada
[8] Univ New Mexico, Coll Populat Hlth, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[9] Catholic Univ Appl Sci Berlin, Inst Social Hlth, Kopenicker Allee 39-5Z, D-10318 Berlin, Germany
关键词
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; OUTCOMES; INTERVENTIONS; SCIENCE; PATIENT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1155/2018/9427452
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Internationally, the interest in involving patients and the public in designing and delivering health interventions and researching their effectiveness is increasing. Several systematic reviews of participation in health research have recently been completed, which note a number of challenges in documenting the impact of participation. Challenges include working across stakeholders with different understandings of participation and levels of experience in reviewing; comparing heterogeneous populations and contexts; configuring findings from often thin descriptions of participation in academic papers; and dealing with different definitions of impact. This paper aims to advance methods for systematically reviewing the impact of participation in health research, drawing on recent systematic review guidance. Practical examples for dealing with issues at each stage of a review are provided based on recent experience. Recommendations for improving primary research on participation in health are offered and key points to consider during the review are summarised.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Assessing the health benefits of advice services: using research evidence and logic model methods to explore complex pathways [J].
Allmark, Peter ;
Baxter, Susan ;
Goyder, Elizabeth ;
Guillaume, Louise ;
Crofton-Martin, Gerard .
HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2013, 21 (01) :59-68
[2]   Using logic models to capture complexity in systematic reviews [J].
Anderson, Laurie M. ;
Petticrew, Mark ;
Rehfuess, Eva ;
Armstrong, Rebecca ;
Ueffing, Erin ;
Baker, Phillip ;
Francis, Daniel ;
Tugwell, Peter .
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2011, 2 (01) :33-42
[3]  
[Anonymous], METH JBI SCOP REV J
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, DISSEMINATION IMPLEM, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199751877.003.0001
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Community Development Journal, DOI [10.1093/cdj/bsn010, DOI 10.1093/CDJ/BSN010]
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, COMMUNITY BASED PART
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2011, NIH PUBLICATION
[8]   LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION [J].
ARNSTEIN, SR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04) :216-224
[9]   Synthesizing diverse evidence: the use of primary qualitative data analysis methods and logic models in public health reviews [J].
Baxter, S. ;
Killoran, A. ;
Kelly, M. P. ;
Goyder, E. .
PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 124 (02) :99-106
[10]   Using logic model methods in systematic review synthesis: describing complex pathways in referral management interventions [J].
Baxter, Susan K. ;
Blank, Lindsay ;
Woods, Helen Buckley ;
Payne, Nick ;
Rimmer, Melanie ;
Goyder, Elizabeth .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2014, 14