Impact of biogas plants on rural residential property values and implications for local acceptance

被引:38
作者
Zemo, Kahsay Haile [1 ]
Panduro, Toke Emil [2 ]
Termansen, Mette [2 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Frederiksborgvej 399, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Food & Resource Econ, Rolighedsvej 25, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
关键词
Hedonic pricing method; Biogas; Local acceptance; Spatial generalized additive model; Capitalization effect; RENEWABLE ENERGY; PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE; POLICY; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.008
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper, we investigate the impact of large- and farm-scale biogas plants on the rural residential property values. We use data from 11,279 rural housing transactions in the period 2007-2015 and trace spatial effects of biogas plants on the local property market. Our results show that large biogas plants have a significant negative impact on rural residential property values while farm-scale biogas plants have a significant positive impact. The findings suggest that preferences for or against biogas plants cannot be explained by either a NIMBY or a PIMBY phenomenon and the paper explores potential reasons for the observed disparity in valuation of farm- and large-scale biogas plants. An economic impact assessment of the choice of facility type, based on a concrete case study, indicates that the impact on residential property values may tip the scale in favor of farm-scale biogas plants. Based on these results, policy implications for planning and expansion of biogas production are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1121 / 1131
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
[11]  
EBA, 2013, EUR BIOG ASS BIOG RE
[12]  
Foged H, 2012, LIVESTOCK MANURE ENE
[13]  
Geniaux G., 2008, HEDONIC METHODS HOUS, P101
[14]   MOSTLY POINTLESS SPATIAL ECONOMETRICS? [J].
Gibbons, Stephen ;
Overman, Henry G. .
JOURNAL OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2012, 52 (02) :172-191
[15]   Not in my backyard, but not far away from me: Local acceptance of wind power in China [J].
Guo, Yue ;
Ru, Peng ;
Su, Jun ;
Anadon, Laura Diaz .
ENERGY, 2015, 82 :722-733
[16]  
Hastie T., 1986, STAT SCI, V1, P297, DOI [DOI 10.1214/SS/1177013609, 10.1214/ss/1177013604, DOI 10.1214/SS/1177013604]
[17]   Contingent Valuation: From Dubious to Hopeless [J].
Hausman, Jerry .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2012, 26 (04) :43-56
[18]   Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework [J].
Huijts, N. M. A. ;
Molin, E. J. E. ;
Steg, L. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (01) :525-531
[19]   Do Stormwater Basins Generate co-Benefits? Evidence from Baltimore County, Maryland [J].
Irwin, Nicholas B. ;
Klaiber, H. Allen ;
Irwin, Elena G. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 141 :202-212
[20]  
Jacobsen B. H, 2013, BIOGASPRODUKTION DAN