Spatial discounting of ecosystem services

被引:18
作者
Yamaguchi, Rintaro [1 ]
Shah, Payal [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Environm Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058506, Japan
[2] Okinawa Inst Sci & Technol Grad Univ, 1919-1 Tancha, Onna Son, Okinawa 9040495, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Spatial discounting; Discounting; Spatial decay; Ecosystem services; Welfare economic theory; Willingness to pay; Benefit transfer; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; DISTANCE-DECAY FUNCTIONS; INEQUALITY; QUALITY; WELFARE; SUBSTITUTABILITY; IMPROVEMENTS; ECONOMICS; BENEFITS; WETLANDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.reseneeco.2020.101186
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The impact of conservation efforts targeted at preserving ecosystem services largely depend on the welfare implications associated with spatial variations in the provision of ecosystem services. While there is ample empirical evidence of spatial discounting or decay of the valuation of ecosystem services, there are still few underpinnings based on welfare economic theory. We establish a theory of spatial discounting that closely follows the concept of time discounting pertaining to climate change, and show spatial discount rates in the consumption, ecosystem service, and willingness to pay (WTP) numeraires. We consider the role of key parameters such as pure rate of spatial preference, consumption change, ecosystem services change, population density, and elasticity of marginal utility. We find that the spatial discount rate of WTP for ecosystem services that frequently appears in the empirical literature is the difference between the ecosystem service discount rate and consumption discount rate, where the ecosystem service discount rate includes both physical distance decay and welfare effects. Finally, we use numerical simulations to illustrate how the three different spatial discount rates vary with the spatial distance from the source of ecosystem services and with consumption patterns, implying many more possible spatial variations of WTP. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   Demand-side factors in optimal land conservation choice [J].
Ando, Amy W. ;
Shah, Payal .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2010, 32 (02) :203-221
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human well-being, V5
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, WEAK VERS STRONG
[4]   Inequality and the Social Cost of Carbon [J].
Anthoff, David ;
Emmerling, Johannes .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS, 2019, 6 (02) :29-59
[5]  
Arrow K., 1999, Discounting and intergenerational equity
[6]   Should Governments Use a Declining Discount Rate in Project Analysis? [J].
Arrow, Kenneth J. ;
Cropper, Maureen L. ;
Gollier, Christian ;
Groom, Ben ;
Heal, Geoffrey M. ;
Newell, Richard G. ;
Nordhaus, William D. ;
Pindyck, Robert S. ;
Pizer, William A. ;
Portney, Paul R. ;
Sterner, Thomas ;
Tol, Richard S. J. ;
Weitzman, Martin L. .
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2014, 8 (02) :145-163
[7]   Using Individualised Choice Maps to Capture the Spatial Dimensions of Value Within Choice Experiments [J].
Badura, Tomas ;
Ferrini, Silvia ;
Burton, Michael ;
Binner, Amy ;
Bateman, Ian J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2020, 75 (02) :297-322
[8]  
Barbier Edward B., 2008, Foundations and Trends in Microeconomics, V4, P611, DOI 10.1561/0700000031
[9]   A spatial model of coastal ecosystem services [J].
Barbier, Edward B. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 78 :70-79
[10]   The aggregation of environmental benefit values: Welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP [J].
Bateman, Ian J. ;
Day, Brett H. ;
Georgiou, Stavros ;
Lake, Iain .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 60 (02) :450-460