Differences in Perceptions of Health Information Between the Public and Health Care Professionals: Nonprobability Sampling Questionnaire Survey

被引:13
作者
Gesser-Edelsburg, Anat
Shahbari, Nour Abed Elhadi
Cohen, Ricky
Halavi, Adva Mir
Hijazi, Rana
Paz-Yaakobovitch, Galit
Birman, Yael
机构
[1] Hlth & Risk Commun Res Ctr, Haifa, Israel
[2] Sch Publ Hlth, Haifa, Israel
关键词
health information-seeking; reading and understanding; quality criteria for health journalists; Web-based and newspaper health information sources; journalistic articles; public healthcare workers and the general public; WORLD-WIDE-WEB; SEEKING BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL MEDIA; PATIENT INFORMATION; INTERNET; ONLINE; QUALITY; CANCER; TRUST; NEWS;
D O I
10.2196/14105
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In the new media age, the public searches for information both online and offline. Many studies have examined how the public reads and understands this information but very few investigate how people assess the quality of journalistic articles as opposed to information generated by health professionals. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine how public health care workers (HCWs) and the general public seek, read, and understand health information and to investigate the criteria by which they assess the quality of journalistic articles. Methods: A Web-based nonprobability sampling questionnaire survey was distributed to Israeli HCWs and members of the public via 3 social media outlets: Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram. A total of 979 respondents participated in the online survey via the Qualtrics XM platform. Results: The findings indicate that HCWs find academic articles more reliable than do members of the general public (44.4% and 28.4%, respectively, P<.001). Within each group, we found disparities between the places where people search for information and the sources they consider reliable. HCWs consider academic articles to be the most reliable, yet these are not their main information sources. In addition, HCWs often use social networks to search for information (18.2%, P<.001), despite considering them very unreliable (only 2.2% found them reliable, P<.001). The same paradoxes were found among the general public, where 37.5% (P<.001) seek information via social networks yet only 8.4% (P<.001) find them reliable. Out of 6 quality criteria, 4 were important both to HCWs and to the general public. Conclusions: In the new media age where information is accessible to all, the quality of articles about health is of critical importance. It is important that the criteria examined in this research become the norm in health writing for all stakeholders who write about health, whether they are professional journalists or citizen journalists writing in the new media.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 144 条
[1]   "It's Got to Be on This Page": Age and Cognitive Style in a Study of Online Health Information Seeking [J].
Agree, Emily M. ;
King, Abby C. ;
Castro, Cynthia M. ;
Wiley, Adrienne ;
Borzekowski, Dina L. G. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2015, 17 (03)
[2]   Online health information seeking among women: the moderating role of health consciousness [J].
Ahadzadeh, Ashraf Sadat ;
Sharif, Saeed Pahlevan ;
Ong, Fon Sim .
ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2018, 42 (01) :58-72
[3]   A Qualitative Analysis of How Elders Seek and Disseminate Health Information [J].
Altizer, Kathryn ;
Grzywacz, Joseph ;
Quandt, Sara ;
Bell, Ronny ;
Arcury, Thomas .
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION, 2014, 35 (04) :337-353
[4]  
[Anonymous], NEWS HAPP STUD NEWS
[5]  
[Anonymous], ISRAELIS FACEBOOK MO
[6]  
[Anonymous], US SOURC INF HLTH ME
[7]  
[Anonymous], DIGITAL BLOOM ISRAEL
[8]  
[Anonymous], PERCEPTIONS ATTITUDE
[9]  
[Anonymous], HLTH INFORM SEEKING
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2002, RISK COMMUNICATION M