Intratympanic dexamethasone for sudden sensorineural hearing loss after failure of systemic therapy

被引:225
|
作者
Haynes, David S. [1 ]
O'Malley, Matthew [1 ]
Cohen, Seth [1 ]
Watford, Kenneth [1 ]
Labadie, Robert F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol, Otol Grp, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
关键词
sudden sensorineural HL; intratympanic therapy; dexamethasone; steroid perfusion;
D O I
10.1097/01.mlg.0000245058.11866.15
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective. Intratympanic steroids are increasingly used in the treatment of inner ear disorders, especially in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) who have failed systemic therapy. We reviewed our experience with intratympanic steroids in the treatment of patients with sudden SNHL to determine overall success, morbidity, and prognostic factors. Hypothesis. Intratympanic steroids have minimal morbidity and the potential to have a positive effect on hearing recovery in patients with sudden SNHL who have failed systemic therapy. Study Design: The authors conducted a retrospective review. Methods: Patients presenting with sudden SNHL defined as a rapid decline in hearing over 3 days or less affecting 3 or more frequencies by 30 dB or greater who underwent intratympanic steroids therapy (24 mg/mL dexamethasone) were reviewed. Excluded were patients with Meniere disease, retrocochlear disease, autoimmune HL, trauma, fluctuating HL, radiation-induced HL, noise-induced HL, or any other identifiable etiology for sudden HL. Patients who showed signs of fluctuation of hearing after injection were excluded. Pretreatment and posttreatment audiometric evaluations including pure-tone average (PTA) and speech reception threshold (SRT) were analyzed. Patient variables as they related to recovery were studied and included patient age, time to onset of therapy, status of the contralateral ear, presence of diabetes, severity of HL, and presence of associated symptoms (tinnitus, vertigo). A 20-dB gain in PTA or a 20% improvement in SDS was considered significant. Results. Forty patients fit the criteria for inclusion in the study. The mean age of the patients was 54.8 years with a range from 17 to 84 years of age. Overall, 40% (n = 16) showed any improvement in PTA or SDS. Fourteen (35%) men and 26 (65%) women were included. Using the criteria of 20-dB improvement in PTA or 20% improvement in SDS for success, 27.5% (n = 11) showed improvement. The mean number of days from onset of symptoms to intratympanic therapy was 40 days with a range of 7 days to 310 days. A statistically significant difference was noted in those patients who received earlier injection (P =.0008, rank sum test). No patient receiving intratympanic dexamethasone after 36 days recovered hearing using 20-dB PTA decrease or a 20% increase in discrimination as criteria for recovery. Twelve percent (n = 5) of patients in the study had diabetes with 20% recovering after intratympanic dexamethasone (not significantly different from non-diabetics at 28.6%, Fisher exact test, P = 1.0). Comparison to other studies that used differing steroid type, concentration, dosing schedule, inclusion criteria, and criteria for success revealed, in many instances, a similar overall recovery rate. Conclusions. Difficulty in proving efficacy of a single modality is present in all studies on SNHL secondary to multiple treatment protocols, variable rates of recovery, and a high rate of spontaneous recovery. Forty percent of patients showed some improvement in SDS or PTA after treatment failure. When criteria of 20-dB PTA or 20% is considered to define improvement, the recovery rate was 27.5%. Modest improvement is seen with the current protocol of a single intratympanic steroid injection of 24 mg/mL dexamethasone in patients who failed systemic therapy. Dramatic hearing recovery in treatment failures was rarely encountered. No patient showed significant benefit from intratympanic steroids after 36 days when using this protocol for idiopathic sudden SNHL. If patients injected after 6 weeks are xcluded from the study, the improvement rate increases from 26.9% to 39.3%. Earlier intratympanic injection had a significant impact on hearing recovery, although with any therapeutic intervention for sudden SNHL, early success may be attributed to natural history. If we further exclude seven patients treated with intratympanic steroids within 2 weeks of the onset of symptoms (i.e., study only those patients treated with intratympanic dexamethasone between 2 and 6 weeks after onset of symptoms), still, 26% improved by 20 dB or 20% SDS. The recovery rates after initial systemic failure are higher than would be expected in this treatment failure group given our control group (9.1%) and literature review. These findings indicate a positive effect from steroid perfusion in this patient population.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 15
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intratympanic steroids for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss
    Fitzgerald, Dennis C.
    McGuire, John F.
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2007, 116 (04) : 253 - 256
  • [32] Efficacy of systemic and intratympanic corticosteroid combination therapy versus intratympanic or systemic therapy in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a randomized controlled trial
    Ashtiani, Mohammadtaghi Khorsandi
    Firouzi, Farzad
    Bastaninejad, Shahin
    Dabiri, Sasan
    Nasirmohtaram, Sevil
    Saeedi, Niloufar
    Ghazavi, Hossein
    Sahebi, Leyla
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 275 (01) : 89 - 97
  • [33] Systemic Steroid Versus Combined Systemic and Intratympanic Steroid Treatment for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss
    Baysal, Elif
    Tunc, Orhan
    Baglam, Tekin
    Durucu, Cengiz
    Oz, Arzu
    Karatas, Zeynel Abidin
    Polat, Mustafa
    Celenk, Fatih
    Mumbuc, Semih
    Kanlikama, Muzaffer
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 24 (02) : 432 - 434
  • [34] Differences in hearing recovery following intratympanic alone or intravenous dexamethasone with rescue intratympanic steroids for sudden sensorineural hearing loss: A randomised trial
    Huang, Jie
    Yang, Li
    Cao, Xihong
    Wang, Wuqing
    CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 46 (03) : 546 - 551
  • [35] Intratympanic and Systemic Steroids for Sudden Hearing Loss
    Koltsidopoulos, Petros
    Bibas, Athanasios
    Sismanis, Aristides
    Tzonou, Anastasia
    Seggas, Ioannis
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2013, 34 (04) : 771 - 776
  • [36] Transtympanic dexamethasone - sudden sensorineural hearing loss
    Chowdary, Kumar K. V. S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLOGY, 2014, 20 (03) : 140 - 142
  • [37] Sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Intratympanic corticoidea infiltration
    Bejarano-Panades, N.
    Sarria Echegaray, P.
    Tomas Barberan, M.
    MEDICINA BALEAR, 2009, 24 (01): : 26 - 36
  • [38] Intratympanic steroids as a salvage therapy for severe to profound idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss
    Covelli, Edoardo
    Altabaa, Khaled
    Verillaud, Benjamin
    Camous, Domitille
    Hautefort, Charlotte
    Barbara, Maurizio
    Herman, Philippe
    Kania, Romain
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2018, 138 (11) : 966 - 971
  • [39] The Impact of Intratympanic Steroid Dosage on Hearing Recovery in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss
    Nelson, Lacey
    Swanson, Daniel
    Borowiec, Elizabeth
    Crossley, Jason
    Geng, Xue
    Cao, Xiao
    Kim, Hung Jeffrey
    Hoa, Michael
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2023, 132 (08) : 879 - 887
  • [40] Comparison of Batroxobin Versus the Combination of Batroxobin and Intratympanic Dexamethasone Injection in the Treatment of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss
    Jia, Qiaofei
    Zhu, Jingjing
    Wu, Dezhong
    Chen, Tengfang
    Hong, Chaoqun
    ENT-EAR NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL, 2024,