Brain Injury Functional Outcome Measure (BI-FOM): A Single Instrument Capturing the Range of Recovery in Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

被引:9
作者
Whyte, John [1 ]
Giacino, Joseph T. [2 ]
Heinemann, Allen W. [3 ,4 ]
Bodien, Yelena [2 ]
Hart, Tessa [1 ]
Sherer, Mark [5 ]
Whiteneck, Gale G. [6 ]
Mellick, David [6 ]
Hammond, Flora M. [7 ,8 ]
Semik, Patrick [4 ]
Rosenbaum, Amy [9 ]
Richardson, Risa Nakase [10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, Moss Rehabil Res Inst, Elkins Pk, PA USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Spaulding Rehabil Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Shirley Ryan Abil Lab, Ctr Rehabil Outcomes Res, Chicago, IL USA
[5] TIRR Mem Hermann, Houston, TX USA
[6] Craig Hosp Res Dept, Englewood, CO USA
[7] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[8] Rehabil Hosp Indiana, Indianapolis, IN USA
[9] Pk Terrace Care Ctr, Flushing, NY USA
[10] James A Haley Vet Hosp, DVBIC, MHBS, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[11] Univ S Florida, Morsani Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Pulm & Sleep Med, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2021年 / 102卷 / 01期
关键词
COGNITIVE TEST; RATING-SCALE; DISABILITY; RECOMMENDATIONS; VALIDATION; DELIRIUM; COMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.377
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To develop a measure of global functioning after moderate-severe TBI with similar measurement precision but a longer measurement range than the FIM. Design: Phase 1: retrospective analysis of 5 data sets containing FIM, Disability Rating Scale, and other assessment items to identify candidate items for extending the measurement range of the FIM; Phase 2: prospective administration of 49 candidate items from phase 1, with Rasch analysis to identify a unidimensional scale with an extended range. Setting: Six TBI Model System rehabilitation hospitals. Participants: Individuals (N=184) with moderate-severe injury recruited during inpatient rehabilitation or at 1-year telephone follow-up. Interventions: Participants were administered the 49 assessment items in person or via telephone. Main Outcome Measures: Item response theory parameters: item monotonicity, infit/outfit statistics, and Factor 1 variance. Results: After collapsing misordered rating categories and removing misfitting items, we derived the Brain Injury Functional Outcome Measure (BI-FOM), a 31-item assessment instrument with high reliability, greatly extended measurement range, and improved unidimensionality compared with the FIM. Conclusions: The BI-FOM improves global measurement of function after moderate-severe brain injury. Its high precision, relative lack of floor and ceiling effects, and feasibility for telephone follow-up, if replicated in an independent sample, are substantial advantages. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2021;102:87-96 (c) 2020 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 96
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2007, RASCH MEASUREMENT T
  • [2] Measuring Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury Treatment Trials: Recommendations From the Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Trials Network
    Bagiella, Emilia
    Novack, Thomas A.
    Ansel, Beth
    Diaz-Arrastia, Ramon
    Dikmen, Sureyya
    Hart, Tessa
    Temkin, Nancy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2010, 25 (05) : 375 - 382
  • [3] Supervision rating scale: A measure of functional outcome from brain injury
    Boake, C
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1996, 77 (08): : 765 - 772
  • [4] Cognitive impairment, clinical symptoms and functional disability in patients emerging from the minimally conscious state
    Bodien, Yelena G.
    Martens, Geraldine
    Ostrow, Joseph
    Sheau, Kristen
    Giacino, Joseph T.
    [J]. NEUROREHABILITATION, 2020, 46 (01) : 65 - 74
  • [5] Bond T. G., 2015, Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences, V3rd, P60, DOI [DOI 10.4324/9781315814698, 10.4324/9781315814698]
  • [6] Frontera WR, 2010, DELISAS PHYS MED REH, P575
  • [7] Practice guideline update recommendations summary: Disorders of consciousness Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research
    Giacino, Joseph T.
    Katz, Douglas I.
    Schiff, Nicholas D.
    Whyte, John
    Ashman, Eric J.
    Ashwal, Stephen
    Barbano, Richard
    Hammond, Flora M.
    Laureys, Steven
    Ling, Geoffrey S. F.
    Nakase-Richardson, Risa
    Seel, Ronald T.
    Yablon, Stuart
    Getchius, Thomas S. D.
    Gronseth, Gary S.
    Armstrong, Melissa J.
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2018, 91 (10) : 450 - 460
  • [8] Placebo-Controlled Trial of Amantadine for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
    Giacino, Joseph T.
    Whyte, John
    Bagiella, Emilia
    Kalmar, Kathleen
    Childs, Nancy
    Khademi, Allen
    Eifert, Bernd
    Long, David
    Katz, Douglas I.
    Cho, Sooja
    Yablon, Stuart A.
    Luther, Marianne
    Hammond, Flora M.
    Nordenbo, Annette
    Novak, Paul
    Mercer, Walt
    Maurer-Karattup, Petra
    Sherer, Mark
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 366 (09) : 819 - 826
  • [9] The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: Measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility
    Giacino, JT
    Kalmar, K
    Whyte, J
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2004, 85 (12): : 2020 - 2029
  • [10] Gordon W.A., 1993, J H EAD TRAUMA REHAB, V8, P26