Large- and small-scale interactions and quenching in an α2-dynamo

被引:29
作者
Frick, Peter
Stepanov, Rodion
Sokoloff, Dmitry
机构
[1] Inst Continuous Media Mech, Perm 614013, Russia
[2] Moscow MV Lomonosov State Univ, Dept Phys, Moscow 119899, Russia
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW E | 2006年 / 74卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevE.74.066310
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
The evolution of the large-scale magnetic field in a turbulent flow of conducting fluid is considered in the framework of a multiscale alpha(2)-dynamo model, which includes the poloidal and the toroidal components for the large-scale magnetic field and a shell model for the small-scale magnetohydrodynamical turbulence. The conjugation of the mean-field description for the large-scale field and the shell formalism for the small-scale turbulence is based on strict conformity to the conservation laws. The model displays a substantial magnetic contribution to the alpha effect. It was shown that a large-scale magnetic field can be generated by current helicity even solely. The alpha quenching and the role of the magnetic Prandtl number (P-m) are studied. We have determined the dynamic nature of the saturation mechanism of dynamo action. Any simultaneous cross correlation of alpha and large-scale magnetic field energy E-B is negligible, whereas coupling between alpha and E-B becomes substantial for moderate time lags. An unexpected result is the behavior of the large-scale magnetic energy with variation of the magnetic Prandtl number. Diminishing of P-m does not have an inevitable ill effect on the magnetic field generation. The most efficient large-scale dynamo operates under relatively low Prandtl numbers-then the small-scale dynamo is suppressed and the decrease of P-m can lead even to superequipartition of the large-scale magnetic field (i.e., E-B > E-u). In contrast, the growth of P-m does not promote the large-scale magnetic field generation. A growing counteraction of the magnetic alpha effect reduces the level of mean large-scale magnetic energy at the saturated state.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Antonov TY, 2001, DOKL MATH, V63, P271
[2]   Galactic magnetism: Recent developments and perspectives [J].
Beck, R ;
Brandenburg, A ;
Moss, D ;
Shukurov, A ;
Sokoloff, D .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS, 1996, 34 :155-206
[3]   Shell models of energy cascade in turbulence [J].
Biferale, L .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2003, 35 :441-468
[4]  
Bohr T., 1998, DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS AP
[5]   Magnetic-field generation in Kolmogorov turbulence [J].
Boldyrev, S ;
Cattaneo, F .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2004, 92 (14) :144501-1
[6]   Astrophysical magnetic fields and nonlinear dynamo theory [J].
Brandenburg, A ;
Subramanian, K .
PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, 2005, 417 (1-4) :1-209
[7]   Magnetic helicity evolution in a periodic domain with imposed field [J].
Brandenburg, A ;
Matthaeus, WH .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2004, 69 (05) :7
[8]   How magnetic helicity ejection helps large scale dynamos [J].
Brandenburg, A ;
Blackman, EG ;
Sarson, GR .
MAGNETIC HELICITY AT THE SUN, IN SOLAR WIND AND MAGNETOSPHERES: VISTAS FROM X-RAY OBSERVATORIES, 2003, 32 (10) :1835-1844
[9]   Catastrophic alpha quenching alleviated by helicity flux and shear [J].
Brandenburg, A ;
Sandin, C .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2004, 427 (01) :13-21
[10]   Time evolution of the magnetic activity cycle period [J].
Brandenburg, A ;
Saar, SH ;
Turpin, CR .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 498 (01) :L51-L54