Flow simulation in a complex fluidics using three turbulence models and unstructured grids

被引:11
作者
Wang, Junye [1 ]
Priestman, Geoffrey H. [2 ]
机构
[1] N Wyke Res, Okehampton, England
[2] Univ Sheffield, Dept Chem & Proc Engn, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
Fluidics; Turbulence; Numerical analysis; Simulation; NEAR-WALL;
D O I
10.1108/09615530910938399
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to simulate the behaviour of the symmetrical turn-Lip vortex amplifier (STuVA) to obtain insight into its maximum through-flow operation within the eight-port STuVA, and understand the relation between its design parameters and flow characteristics. Furthermore, it is to test the performance of different turbulent models and near-wall models using the same grid, the same numerical methods and the same computational fluid dynamics code under multiple impingement conditions. Design/methodology/approach - Three turbulence models, the standard k-epsilon, the renormalization group (RNG) k-epsilon model and the Reynolds stress model (RSM), and three near-wall models have been used to simulate the confined incompressible turbulent flow in an eight-port STOVA using unstructured meshes. The STOVA is a special symmetrical design of turn-up vortex amplifier, and the simulation focused on its extreme operation in the maximum flow state with no swirling. The predictions were compared with basic pressure-drop flow rate measurements made using air at ambient conditions. The effect of different combinations of turbulence and near-wall models was evaluated. Findings - The RSM gave predictions slightly closer to the experimental data than the other models, although the RNG k-epsilon model predicted nearly as accurately as the RSM. They both improved errors by about 3 per cent compared to the standard k-epsilon model but took a long time for convergence. The modelling of complex flows depends not only on the turbulence model but also on the near-wall treatments and computational economy. In this study a good combination was the RSM, the two layer wail model and the higher order discretization scheme, which improved accuracy by more than 10 per cent compared to the standard k-epsilon model, the standard wall function and first order upwind. Research limitation/implications - The results of this paper are valid for the global pressure drop flow rate. It should be desirable to compare some local information with the experiment. Orginality/value - This paper provides insight into the maximum through-flow operation within the eight-port STOVA to understand the relation between its design parameters and flow characteristics and study the performance of turbulence and near wall models.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 500
页数:17
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Implementation of the renormalization group (RNG) k-ε turbulence model in GOTHIC/6.1b:: solution methods and assessment [J].
Analytis, GT .
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2003, 30 (03) :349-387
[2]   NEAR-WALL TURBULENCE MODELS FOR COMPLEX FLOWS INCLUDING SEPARATION [J].
CHEN, HC ;
PATEL, VC .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1988, 26 (06) :641-648
[3]  
Ferziger J. H., 2002, Computational methods for fluid dynamics
[4]   An assessment of turbulence models applied to the simulation of a two-dimensional submerged jet [J].
Guo, BY ;
Langrish, TAG ;
Fletcher, DF .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2001, 25 (08) :635-653
[5]   A numerical simulation of hydrocyclones [J].
He, P ;
Salcudean, M ;
Gartshore, IS .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 1999, 77 (A5) :429-441
[6]  
JOHSTON JP, 1996, ASME, V118, P219
[7]  
Launder B. E., 1974, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, V3, P269, DOI 10.1016/0045-7825(74)90029-2
[8]   Modelling turbulent separated flow in the context of aerodynamic applications [J].
Leschziner, MA .
FLUID DYNAMICS RESEARCH, 2006, 38 (2-3) :174-210
[9]   MODELING THE FLOW IN A HYDROCYCLONE [J].
MALHOTRA, A ;
BRANION, RMR ;
HAUPTMANN, EG .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1994, 72 (06) :953-960
[10]   A comparison of some recent eddy-viscosity turbulence models [J].
Menter, FR .
JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1996, 118 (03) :514-519