A preliminary assessment of the LMA protector™ in non-paralysed patients

被引:30
作者
Sng, Ban Leong [1 ,2 ]
Ithnin, Farida Binte [1 ]
Mathur, Deepak [1 ]
Lew, Eileen [1 ]
Han, Nian-Lin Reena [3 ]
Sia, Alex Tiong-Heng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] KK Womens & Childrens Hosp, Dept Womens Anaesthesia, 100 Bukit Timah Rd, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Duke NUS Med Sch, 8 Coll Rd, Singapore, Singapore
[3] KK Womens & Childrens Hosp, Div Clin Support Serv, 100 Bukit Timah Rd, Singapore, Singapore
来源
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY | 2017年 / 17卷
关键词
Airway management; Laryngeal mask; Anaesthesia; LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY; ANESTHETIZED PATIENTS; PROSEAL; DEVICES; I-GEL(TM); CROSSOVER;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-017-0323-5
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The LMA Protector (TM) is the latest CE marked single use supraglottic airway device. This airway device provides access and functional separation of the respiratory and digestive tracts. There are two ports (male, female ports) to provide suction in the laryngeal region and insertion of the gastric tube. The aim of our study is to assess the ease of use, airway quality, device positioning, airway leak and complications associated with initial clinical experience in LMA Protector (TM) usage. Methods: This is an initial investigation of LMA Protector (TM) airway device. We conducted a preliminary assessment in the anaesthetised women who underwent minor gynaecological procedures with spontaneous ventilation in order to evaluate the performance of the airway device. Results: Insertion was successful on first and second attempts in 23 (88.5%) and 3 (11.5%) respectively. Median [IQR (range)] insertion time was 19 [17-21(14-58)] seconds. Airway leak pressure was 25.5 [23-29(21-30] cm H2O. On fibreoptic examination via the device, vocal cords were visible in all 26 patients. There were no alternative airway use or airway manipulations required during maintenance of anaesthesia. Six patients had sore throat 24 h after procedures and there was no dysphagia or hoarseness. Conclusion: This pilot study of the LMA protector shows that the device is easily inserted with fast insertion time, providing a reliable and adequate airway seal.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] A comparison of the proseal laryngeal mask to the standard laryngeal mask on anesthesized, non-relaxed patients
    Braun, U
    Zerbst, M
    Füllekrug, B
    Gentzel, I
    Hempel, V
    Leier, M
    Peters, T
    Hobbensiefken, G
    Klein, U
    Heuser, D
    Weyland, A
    Rey, D
    Weirich, C
    Krier, C
    [J]. ANASTHESIOLOGIE INTENSIVMEDIZIN NOTFALLMEDIZIN SCHMERZTHERAPIE, 2002, 37 (12): : 727 - 733
  • [2] The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway - A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients
    Brimacombe, J
    Keller, C
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (01) : 104 - 109
  • [3] Gum elastic Bongie-guided insetfion of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital and introducer tool techniques
    Brimacombe, J
    Keller, C
    Judd, DV
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 100 (01) : 25 - 29
  • [4] A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal™ and Classic™ laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients
    Brimacombe, J
    Keller, C
    Fullekrug, B
    Agrò, F
    Rosenblatt, W
    Dierdorf, SF
    de Lucas, EG
    Capdevilla, X
    Brimacombe, N
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 96 (02) : 289 - 295
  • [5] Evaluation of the LMA Supreme™ in 100 non-paralysed patients
    Cook, T. M.
    Gatward, J. J.
    Handel, J.
    Hardy, R.
    Thompson, C.
    Srivastava, R.
    Clarke, P. A.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2009, 64 (05) : 555 - 562
  • [6] The ProSea™ laryngeal mask airway:: a review of the literature
    Cook, TM
    Lee, G
    Nolan, JP
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2005, 52 (07): : 739 - 760
  • [7] Randomized crossover comparison of the ProSeal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients
    Cook, TM
    Nolan, JP
    Verghese, C
    Strube, PJ
    Lees, M
    Millar, JM
    Baskett, PJF
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 88 (04) : 527 - 533
  • [8] Evaluation of the size 4 i-gel™ airway in one hundred non-paralysed patients
    Gatward, J. J.
    Cook, T. M.
    Seller, C.
    Handel, J.
    Simpson, T.
    Vanek, V.
    Kelly, F.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2008, 63 (10) : 1124 - 1130
  • [9] Joly N, 2014, CAN J ANESTH, V61, P794, DOI 10.1007/s12630-014-0198-6
  • [10] Does the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway prevent aspiration of regurgitated fluid?
    Keller, C
    Brimacombe, J
    Kleinsasser, A
    Loeckinger, A
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 91 (04) : 1017 - 1020